Enhancing public involvement in assistive technology design research

References

• Cowan D, Turner-Smith A. The role of assistive technology in alternative models of care for older people. In: Tinker A, Wright F, McCreadie E, eds. Alternative models of care for older people research, Vol. 2 for Royal Commission on Long Term Care. London: The Stationery Office; 1999:325–46
   Google Scholar
• Sherer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhau H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993;5:36–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biddis E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Med Rehabil 2007;86:977–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan RE, Fregly BJ, Boninger ML, et al. Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:20. Available from: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/9/1/20 [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disabil Soc 2006;25:427–39
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg B. Usability and abandonment of assistive technology. J Assist Technol 2012;6:259–69
   Google Scholar
• Fuad-Luke A. Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. UK: Earthscan; 2009
   Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE: Eastleigh; 2012. Available from: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/INVOLVEBriefingNotesApr2012.pdf [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE: Eastleigh; 2009. Available from: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Involve_Exploring_Impactfinal28.10.09.pdf [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I, Alshawi S. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009;25:514–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research. Design and methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve 2007;35:562–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. Functional electrical stimulation for drop foot of central neurological origin (IPG278); 2009. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG278 [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, et al. Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:439–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Sharp K. The case for case studies in nursing research: the problem of generalization. J Adv Nurs 1998;27:785–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson C. Real World research. A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. 2nd ed. UK: Blackwell; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Williamson T, Rawle A, Bacon E, et al. An evaluation of a nurse-led unit: an action research study. University of Salford/Derbyshire County PCT, UK; 2006. Available from: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/12868/1/PDF_Nurse_Led_Evaluation_FINAL_REPORT_05.02.07.pdf [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley B, Williamson T, Johnson M, et al. The saying hello project. Manchester, UK: University of Salford; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Williamson T, Brogden J, Jones E, Ryan J. Impact of public involvement in research on quality of life and society: a case study of research career trajectories. Int J Consum Stud 2010;34:551–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. Payment for involvement. A guide for making payments to members of the public actively involved in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE: Eastleigh; 2010. Available from: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/INVOLVEPayment-Guiderev2012.pdf [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. An expanded sourcebook. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health Research. Public involvement ‘How To’ guide. Available from: http://www.rds-nw.nihr.ac.uk/public-involvement/how-to-guide/ [last accessed 1 March 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Parker E, Israel B, Williams M, et al. Community action against asthma: Examining the partnership process of a community-based participatory research project. J Gen Intern Med 2013;18:558–67
   Google Scholar
• Heller BW, Clarke AJ, Good TR, et al. Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:74–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prenton S, Kenney LPJ, Stapleton C, et al., eds. The impact of an array based FES system on speed & foot orientation following weeks of home use. IFESS UKI Conference; 2013 Apr 12–13; UK
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner A. Beyond our expectations: a report of the experiences of involving service users in forensic mental health research. National Programme on Forensic Mental Health, R&D. London: Department of Health; 2006
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin H. Involving young service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. Br J Soc Work 2006;36:1395–410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt K, Carter M, Mahtani V, et al. The impact of consumer involvement in research: an evaluation of consumer involvement in the London Primary Care Studies Programme. Fam Pract 2008;25:154–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs L, Moore C. Engaging communities in area-based regeneration: the role of participatory evaluation. Pol Stud 2002;23:157–71
   Google Scholar
• Minkler M, Fadem P, Perry M, et al. Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: A case study from the disability community. Health Educ Behav 2002;29:14–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson C, Allen J, Browning M, et al. A pilot study of therapeutic massage for people with Parkinson’s disease: the added value of user involvement. Complement Therap Clin Pract 2005;11:161–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant L, Beckett J. The practicality and acceptability of an advocacy service in the emergency department for people attending following self-harm. Leeds: University of Leeds; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Smith E, Ross F, Donovan S, et al. Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:298–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar