“It’s got to be more than that”. Parents and speech-language pathologists discuss training content for families with a new speech generating device

References

• Parette P, McMahan GA. What should we expect of assistive technology? Teach Except Child 2002;35:56–61
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RL, Parette HP, Stoner JB, et al. Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Lang Speech Hear Serv 2006;37:50–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Balandin S, Stancliffe R. Australian parents’ experiences of speech generating device (SGD) service delivery. Develop Neurorehabil 2014;17:75–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbart J, Marshall J. “Pushes and pulls” on the parents of children who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2004;20:194–208
   Google Scholar
• Angelo DH. Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augment Altern Commun 2000;16:37–47
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Rackensperger T, Benedek-Wood E, et al. “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:43–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Goldbart J. ‘Communication is everything I think.’ Parenting a child who needs Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:77–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno J, Dribbon M. Outcomes in AAC: evaluating the effectiveness of a parent training program. Augment Altern Commun 1998;14:59–70
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, McNaughton D. Communication partner instruction in AAC: present practices and future directions. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:195–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Goldbart J, Marshall J. Interaction training for conversational partners of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2004;39:151–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M, Sevcik RA, Adamson LB, et al. Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010;53:350–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. “Let’s go star fishing”: reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augment Altern Commun 1997;13:158–71
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, Binger C, Malani M. Teaching partners to support the communication skills of young children who use AAC: lessons from the ImPAACT program. Early Childhood Services 2010;4:155–70
   Google Scholar
• Rosa-Lugo LI, Kent-Walsh J. Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Commun Disord Quarter 2008;30:49–61
   Google Scholar
• Light J, Collier B, Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: part 1 – discourse patterns. Augment Alternat Commun 1985;1:74–83
   Google Scholar
• Ferm U, Andersson M, Broberg M, et al. Parents and course leaders’ experiences of the ComAlong augmentative and alternative communication early intervention course. Disabil Stud Quarter [Internet]. [cited 20 Aug 2013]; 2011;31. Available from: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1718/1768
   Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Walz NC, Carey JC, Williams KM. Brief report: description of feasibility and satisfaction findings from an innovative online family problem-solving intervention for adolescents following traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:517–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavkaytar A, Ceyhan E, Adigüzel OC, et al. Investigating education and support needs of families who have children with intellectual disabilities. Turkish Online J Qualitat Inq 2012;3:79–99
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Anderson KL, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ. Alternative service delivery models for families with a new SGD: perspectives of parents and therapists. Int J Speech-Language Pathol [Accepted 19 Aug, 2014]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett DK. Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. Thousand Oakes (CA): Sage; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Semantic Compaction Systems. Benefits of Minspeak [Internet]. Available from: http://www.minspeak.com/users/BenefitsofMinspeak.php -.U3BssS_95_l [last accessed 12 Mar 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, Judge S. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;47:115–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress CJ, Marvin CA. Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augment Altern Commun 2003;19:254–72
   Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA. Augmentative communication and early intervention – myths and realities. Infant Young Child 2005;18:174–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress CJ. Augmentative and alternative communication and language: understanding and resposnding to parents’ perspectives. Top Lang Disord 2004;24:51–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson A, Kristoffersson L, Ferm U, Thunberg G. The ComAlong communication boards: parents’ use and experiences of aided language stimulation. Augment Altern Commun 2011;27:103–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter B, Cummings J, Cooper L. An exploration of best practice in multi-agency working and the experiences of families of children with complex health needs. What works well and what needs to be done to improve practice for the future? J Clin Nurs 2007;16:527–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2013;29:107–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge S, Townend G. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2013;48:366–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, More L. An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sources. Augment Altern Commun 1992;8:41–56
   Google Scholar
• Iacono TA, Chan JB, Waring RE. Efficacy of a parent-implemented early language intervention based on collaborative consultation. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1998;33:281–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, et al. Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:323–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo DH, Jones SD, Kokoska SM. Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: families of young children. Augment Altern Commun 1995;11:193–201
   Google Scholar