I’ve got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability

References

• United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; 2006 [cited 2015 Jun 3]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald SJ, Clayton J. Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disabil Soc. 2012;28:702–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29:107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICIDH-2). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings (Cat. No. 4430.0) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton P. Communications technology—empowerment or disempowerment? Disabil Handi Soc. 1993;8:339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Bricout JC, Huang J. A common open space or a digital divide? A social model perspective on the online disability community in China. Disabil Soc. 2005;20:49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight L. The case for mobile devices as assistive learning technologies: A literature review. Int J Mob Hum Comput Interact. 2014;6:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wise PH. Emerging technologies and their impact on disability. Future Child 2012;22:169–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling S. Digital exclusion: Coming out from behind closed doors. Disabil Soc. 2011;26:491–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Smith SJ, et al. Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: A single-subject design meta analysis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2006;24:81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington RC. Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil. 2010;25:239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy H, Evans S, Thomas S. Can the web be made accessible for people with intellectual disabilities? Inform Soc. 2011;27:29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell CL. Networking technologies and the rate of technological change. System Cybernet Inform. 2005;3:76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hreha K, Snowdon L. We all can call: Enhancing accessible cell phone usage for clients with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 2011;23:76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop J. The Internet for educating individuals with social impairments. J Comput Assist Learn. 2003;19:546–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbleLink Technologies. Our Solutions Change Lives; 2011 [2011 Sep 9]. Available from: <http://www.ablelinktech.com/index.php?id =16>.
   Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. A palmtop computer-based intelligent aid for individuals with intellectual disabilities to increase independent decision making. Res Pract Pers Sev Disabil. 2003;28:182–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock S, Davies DK, Davies KR, et al. Evaluation of an application for making palmtop computers accessible to individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31:39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TM, Strnadova I, Knox M, et al. Mobile technology in inclusive research: Tools of empowerment. Disabil Soc. 2014;29:999–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipson G. Carbon and computers in Australia. Aust Comput Soc. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Communication and Media Authority. Communications report 2011–12 series, Report 3—Smartphones and tablets Take-up and use in Australia; 2013 [cited 2015 Feb 19]. Available from: <http://www.slideshare.net/acmaSlideShare/acma-communications-report-201112-series-report-3-smartphones-and-tablets>.
   Google Scholar
• Stock SE, Davies DK, Wehmeyer ML, et al. Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52:1155–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunning K, Heath B, Minnion A. Communication and empowerment: A place for rich and multiple media? J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2009;22:370–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TM, Strnadová I, Knox M, et al. Mobile technology in inclusive research: Tools of empowerment. Disabil Soc. 2014;29:999–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren M, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011;55:610–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li-Tsang CW, Lee MY, Yeung SS, et al. A 6-month follow-up of the effects of an information and communication technology (ICT) training programme on people with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2007;28:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AWK, Chan CCH, Li-Tsang CWP, et al. Competence of people with intellectual disabilities on using human–computer interface. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:107–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Daniels H, Porter J, et al. Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2008;21:19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding disabiity: from theory to practice. New York, US: St Martin’s Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T. Exploring disability: a sociological introduction; Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Government. National Disability Insurance Scheme – Our History. Commonwealth Government; 2013 [cited 2013 Nov 1]. Available from: <http://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/our-history>.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA. Introduction. In: Cooper RA, Ohnabe H, Hobson DA, editors. An introduction to rehabilitation engineering. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francis; 2006. p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry JW. What is experiential learning. Guide to business gaming and experiential learning. East Brunswick (NJ): Nichols/GP; 1990. p. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. The landscape of qualitative research. theories and issues. London: Sage; 2003. p. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin R. The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disabil Soc. 2000;15:25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. St. Louis (MO): Elservier; 2008. p. 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• DiGiovine CP, Schein RM, Schmeler MR. Assistive technology device review in clinical practice RESNA Annual Conference, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health – ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen EL, Theodoros D, Russell TG. Use, performance and features of mobile shower commodes: Perspectives of adults with spinal cord injury and expert clinicians. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Ohnabe H, Hobson DA. An introduction to rehabilitation engineering. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baker A. The new Leviathan: a national disability insurance scheme. The Centre For Independent Studies Policy Monograph 131; 2012 [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: <https://www.cis.org.au/images/stories/policy-monographs/pm-131.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Social Services. National Disability Strategy 2010-2020. Canberra: Attorney Generals Department; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling S, Manthorpe J, Cowley S, et al. Person-centred planning in social care: a scoping review. York: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lord J, Hutchison P. Individualised support and funding: Building blocks for capacity building and inclusion. Disabil Soc. 2003;18:71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkes MA, Brown M, Horsburgh D. Self-directed support and people with learning disabilities: A review of the published research evidence. Br J Learn Disabil. 2014;42:87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan D, Cass B, Himmelweit S, et al. The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. J Eur Soc Pol. 2012;22:377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandler H. Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments. Crit Soc Pol. 2004;24:187–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe ML, Brainerd CJ. Cognitive development in adulthood: progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson KA. Dimensions of choice: a qualitative approach to recreation, parks, and leisure research. State College (PA): Venture Publishing; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Martin R. A real life-a real community: The empowerment and full participation of people with an intellectual disability in their community. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31:125–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar