231
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults

, , &
Pages 209-224 | Published online: 17 Nov 2009

References

  • Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3:94–111.
  • Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008;10:e22. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2008/3.e22/HTML (accessed 20 June 2009).
  • Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC. Untangling the Web – the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling 2007;68:218–224.
  • Rutten LF, Moser RP, Beckjord EB, Hesse BW, Croyle RT. Cancer communication: health information national trends survey. National Cancer Institute; 2007, 214 p. Available from: http://hints.cancer.gov/ (accessed 20 June 2009).
  • Friedman DB, Kao EK. A comprehensive assessment of the difficulty level and cultural sensitivity of online cancer prevention resources for older minority men. Preventing Chronic Disease 2008;5(1). Available from: http://www.cdc/gov/pcd/issues/2008/jan/07_0146.htm (accessed 20 March 2009).
  • Donelle L, Hoffman-Goetz L. Functional health literacy and cancer care conversations in online forums for retired persons. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2009;34:59–72.
  • Canada Cancer Society's Steering Committee. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2009; Toronto. Canada: Canadian Cancer Society; 2009, pp. 127. [ISSN 0835-2976].
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine 1999;49:651–661.
  • Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research 2001;16:671–692.
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences 2007;17:147–159.
  • Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008; Toronto, Canada, Canadian Cancer Society; 2008 [ISSN 0835-2976].
  • Rootman I, Gordon-El-Bihbety D. A vision for a health literate Canada: Report of the expert panel on health literacy. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association; 2008, 50 pp. Available from: http://www.cpha.ca/en/portal/h-l/panel.aspx (accessed 20 June 2009).
  • Statistics Canada. Building on our competencies: Canadian results of the International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 2005 [Catalogue no. 89-617-XIE].
  • Rudd R, Horowitz AM. The role of health literacy in achieving oral health for elders. Journal of Dental Education 2005;69:1018–1021.
  • Donelle L, Hoffman-Goetz L, Arocha JF. Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Health Communication 2007;12:651–665.
  • Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. An exploratory study of older adults' comprehension of printed cancer information: Is readability a key factor? Journal of Health Communication 2007;12:423–437.
  • Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD. Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Education & Behavior 1998;25:613–624.
  • Levinthal BR, Morrow DG, Tu W, Wu J, Murray MD. Cognition and health literacy in patients with hypertension. Journal of General Internal Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine 2008;23:1172–1176.
  • Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International 2000;15:259–267.
  • Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America's adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington (DC): US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006.
  • Golbeck AL, Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Paschal AM, Dismuke SE. A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005;29:375–376.
  • Rothman RL, Housam R, Weiss H, David D, Gregory R, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, Elasy TA. Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006;31:391–398.
  • Apter AJ, Paasche-Orlow MK, Remillard JT, Bennett IM, Ben-Joseph EP, Batista RM, Hyde J, Rudd RE. Numeracy and communication with patients: They are counting on us. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2008;23:2117–2124.
  • Sheridan SL, Pignone M. Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data. Effective Clinical Practice 2002;5:35–40.
  • Sheridan SL, Pignone MP, Lewis CL. A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003;18:884–892.
  • Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Moncur M, Gabriel S, Tosteson AN. Assessing values for health: numeracy matters. Medical Decision Making 2001;21:382–390.
  • Zamarian L, Sinz H, Bonatti E, Gamboz N, Delazer M. Normal Aging Affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk. Neuropsychology 2008;22:645–657.
  • Gazmararian JA, Parker RM, Baker DW. Reading skills and family planning knowledge and practices in a low-income managed-care population. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;93:239–244.
  • Brase GL. A field study of how different numerical information formats influence charity support. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 2008;20:1–13.
  • Timmermans D, Molewijk B, Stiggelbout A, Kievit J. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient Education and Counseling 2004;54:255–263.
  • Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making 2007;696–713.
  • Donelle L, Arocha JF, Hoffman-Goetz L. Health literacy and numeracy: key factors in cancer risk comprehension. Chronic Diseases in Canada 2008;29:1–8.
  • Canadian Cancer Society (2008).Canadian Cancer Statistics [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cancer.ca (accessed 31 May 2008).
  • Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making 2001;21:37–44.
  • Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997;127:966–972.
  • Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockabee J, Hale FA. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine 2005;3:514–522.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. Highlights From the 2003 International Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey (ALL) [Internet]. Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005117.pdf (accessed 16 March 2009).
  • McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading: A new reading formula. Journal of Reading 1969;12:639–640.
  • Ancker JS, Kaufman D. Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14:713–721.
  • Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making 2007;27:696–713.
  • Nelson W, Reyna VF, Fagerlin A, Lipkus I, Peters E. Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2008;35:261–274.
  • Statistics Canada. Canadians with literacy problems. Ministry of industry [85F0033MIE] 2001. Available from: http://dsp-psd.tpsgc.gc.ca/Collection/Statcan/85F0033M/85F0033MIE2001003.pdf (accessed 20 March 2009).
  • Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Risk charts: Putting cancer in context. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002;94:799–804.
  • Silverman E, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Byram SJ, Welch HG, Fischhoff B. Women's views on breast cancer risk and screening mammography: A qualitative interview study. Medical Decision Making 2001;21:231–240.
  • Canadian Council on Learning (2003). Testing literacy skills [Internet]. Available from: www.ccl-cca.ca/CCL/Reports/LiteracySelfAssessment/aboutliteracy.htm (accessed 31 May 2009).
  • Ginde AA, Clark S, Goldstein JN, Camargo CA Jr. Demographic disparities in numeracy among emergency department patients: Evidence from two multicenter studies. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;72:350–356.
  • Huizinga MM, Elasy TA, Wallston KA, Cavanaugh K, David D, Gregory RP, Fuch LS, Malone R, Cherrington A, DeWalt DA, Buse J, Pignone MP, Rothman RL. Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). BMC Health Services Research 2008;8:96. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/96. (accessed 20 June 2009).
  • Social Trends in America (2009). How educated are we – functional literacy and educational attainment [Internet]. Available from: http://social.jrank.org/pages/939/How-Educated-Are-We-Functional-Literacy-Educational-Attainment.html (accessed 20 June 2009).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.