Speech-language pathologists' views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices

References

• American Speech Language and Hearing Association. (2004). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Technical report. ASHA Supplement, 24, 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ballin, L., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R., & Togher, L. (2010). The views of people who use speech generating devices on mentoring new learners. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ballin, L., Balandin, S., Togher, L., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2009). Learning to use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Is there a mentoring role for adults experienced in using AAC? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 43, 89–91.
   Google Scholar
• Band, S., Lindsay, G., Law, J., Soloff, N., Peacey, N., Gascoigne, M., et al. (2002). Are health and education talking to each other? Perceptions of parents of children with speech and language needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Britner, P. A., Balcazar, F. E., Blechman, E. A., Blinn-Pike, L., & Larose, S. (2006). Mentoring special youth populations. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C. (2010). “It's not everyday that parents get a chance to talk like this”: Exploring parents' perceptions and expectations of speech-language pathology services for children with intellectual disability. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case-Smith, J., & Holland, T. (2009). Making decisions about service delivery in early childhood programs. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 416–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, M., McConachie, H., Price, K., & Wood, P. (2001). Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, K. J., & Light, J. C. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protege relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 518–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., & Hamilton, S. F. (2002). Why mentoring in the workplace works. New Directions for Youth Development, 93, 59–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, S. (2007). Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disability and Society, 22, 457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 505–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolleff, N., McConachie, H., Winyard, S., Jones, S., Wisbeach, A., & Clayton, C. (1992). Communication aids for children: Procedures and problems. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34, 719–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998a). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. In D. L. Morgan, & R. A. Krueger (Eds.), Focus group kit(Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998b). Moderating focus groups. In D. L. Morgan, & R. A. Krueger (Eds.), The focus group kit(Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus group interviews: A practical guide for applied research. (3rd ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., Lindsay, G., Peacey, N., Gascoigne, M., Soloff, N., Radford, J., et al. (2002). Consultation as a model for providing speech and language therapy in schools: A panacea or one step too far? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18, 145–163.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., Krezman, C., Williams, M., Gulens, M., Galskoy, A., et al. (2007). The AAC Mentor Project: Web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 56–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, F., Markova, I., Murphy, J., Moodie, E., & Collins, S. (1997). Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 235–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CASage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1998). The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Murchland, S., & Wake-Dyster, W. (2006). Resource allocation for community-based therapy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1425–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A., Reilly, S., Bloomberg, K., & Johnson, H. (2002). An analysis of needs for people with a disability who have complex communication needs. Melbourne, Victoria: La Trobe University, School of Human Communication Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D'Silva, K. (2005). “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., & Connolly, I. (2008). Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 3, 260–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Speech Pathology Association of Australia. (1997). Position paper: Augmentative and alternative communication. Melbourne, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Speech Pathology Australia. (2010). Mentoring Program. Available online at: http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/membership/mentoring-program, accessed 11 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stumbo, N. J., Blegen, A. R., & Lindahl-Lewis, P. (2008). Two mentorship case studies of high school and university students with disabilities: Milestones and lessons. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 74, 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D. E., Gillon, G. G., & Yoder, D. E. (2005). AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Togher, L. (2010). Volunteering and paid work for adults who use AAC. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volunteering Australia. (2005). Definitions and principles of volunteering. Melbourne: Volunteering Australia.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Brekke, K. M., Sjøthun, B., & Grindheim, E. (2005). Constructing preschool communities of learners that afford alternative language development. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 82–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar