310
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Does mode of administration affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after stroke?

, , , &
Pages 329-337 | Published online: 04 Apr 2012

References

  • Brott, T., Adams, H. P., Olinger, C. P., Marler, J. R., Barsan, W. G., Biller, J., .(1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke, 20, 964–970.
  • Damasio A. R. (1991). Signs of aphasia. In M. T. Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (2nd ed.) (pp. 27–50). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Doyle, P., McNeil, M., Hula, W., & Mikolic, J.(2003). The burden of stroke scale (BOSS) Aphasiology, 17, 291–304.
  • Duncan, P. W., Reker, D., Kwon, S., Lai, S. M., Studenski, S., Perera, S., .(2005). Measuring stroke impact with the stroke impact scale: Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. MedCare, 43, 507–515.
  • Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.
  • Enderby, P., Wood, V., Wade, D. (1987). Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
  • Erhart, M., Wetzel, R. M., Krügel, A., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2009). Effects of phone versus mail survey methods on the measurement of health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents. BMC Public Health, 30, 491–502.
  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
  • Hall, K. M., Hamilton, B. B., Gordon, W. A., & Zasler, N. D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability rating scale, functional independence measure and functional assessment measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 60–75.
  • Hanmer, J., Hays, R., & Fryback, D. G. (2007). Mode of administration is important in U.S. national estimates of health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 45, 1171–1179.
  • Harris, L. E., Weinberger, M., & Tierney, W. M. (1997). Assessing inner-city patients’ hospital experiences: A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Medical Care, 35, 70–76.
  • Hays, R. D., Kim, S., Spritzer, K. L., Kaplan, R. M., Tally, S., Feeny, D., .(2009). Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores. Value Health, 12, 1035–1039.
  • Hilari, K., & Byng, S. (2009). Health-related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 193–205.
  • Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke, 34, 1944–1950.
  • Hilari, K., Lamping, D. L., Smith, S. C., Northcott, S., Lamb, A., & Marshall J. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 544–557.
  • Hilari, K., Northcott, S., Roy, P., Marshall, J., Wiggins, R. D., Chataway, J., .(2010). Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: The first six months. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 181–190.
  • Hoffmann, T., Worrall, L., Eames, S., & Ryan, A. (2010). Measuring outcomes in people who have had a stroke and their carers: Can the telephone be used? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17, 119–127.
  • Kagan, A., & Gailey, G. (1993). Functional is not enough: Training conversation partners for aphasic adults. In A. L. Holland, & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp.199–225). London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. In M. G. Eisenberg, & R. C. Grzesiak (Eds.), Advances in clinical rehabilitation (pp. 6–18). New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Lawson, R., & Fawcus, M. (1999). Increasing effective communication using a total communication approach. In S. Byng, K. Swinburn, & C. Pound (Eds.), The aphasia therapy file (pp. 61–74). Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Leonardi-Bee, J., Steiner, T., & Bath-Hextall, F. J. (2009). Naftidrofuryl for acute stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1, 1–29.
  • Mauchly, J. (1940). Significance test for sphericity for a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 204–209.
  • McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., Ware, J.E. (1994). Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Medical Care, 32, 551–567.
  • Rhodes, T., Girman, C. J., Jacobsen, S. J., Guess, H. A., Hanson, K. A., Oesterling, J. E., .(1995). Does the mode of administration affect the reporting of urinary problems? American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, S49.
  • Robinson, B. (1983). Validation of a caregiver strain index. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 344–348.
  • Royal College of Physicians. (2008). National clinical guideline for stroke (3rd ed.). Report prepared by the intercollegiate working party for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians.
  • Segal, M. E., Gillard, M., & Schall, R. R. (1996). Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 208–212.
  • Shah, S., Vanclay, F., & Cooper, B. (1989). Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703–709.
  • Smeeth, L., Fletcher, A. E., Stirling, S., Nunes, M., Breeze, E., Ng, E., .(2001). Randomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: Findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community. British Medical Journal, 323, 1–7.
  • Sprangers, M. A. G., de Regt, E. B., Andries, F., van Agt, H. M. E., Bijl, R. V., de Boer, J. B., . (2000). Which chronic conditions are associated with a better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 895–907.
  • Tomlin, M. E., Pinney, S., Buncher, C. R., McKay, R., & Brown, M. K. (1998). The effect of the mode of questionnaire administration on workers’ responses to cigarette smoking questions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, S85.
  • Weinberger, M., Nagle, B., Hanlon, J. T., Samsa, G. P., Schmader, K., Landsman, P. B., .(1994). Assessing health-related quality of life in elderly outpatients: Telephone versus face-to-face administration. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42, 1295–1299.
  • Weinberger, M., Oddone, E. Z., Samsa, G. P., & Landsman, P. B. (1996). Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 135–140.
  • Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specifc quality of life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362–1369.
  • Zigmond, A., & Snaith, R. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 61–70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.