Optimal intervention intensity in speech-language pathology: Discoveries, challenges, and unchartered territories

References

• Allen, M. M. (in press). Treatment efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. (2012). Optimal intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., & Enderby, P. (2012). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD000425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnaby, G., Hankey, G. J., & Pizzi, J. (2006). Behavioural intervention for dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurology, 5, 31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, L. R. (2012). Aphasia treatment: Intensity, dose parameters and script training. International Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 14, 424–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrou, C., Pry, R., Pernon, E., Michelon, C., Aussilloux, C., & Baghdadli, A. (2010). Outcomes of young children with autism: Does the amount of intervention influence developmental trajectories?Autism, 14, 633–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denne, M., Langdown, N., Pring, T., & Roy, P. (2005). Treating children with expressive phonological disorders: Does phonological awareness therapy work in clinic. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C., Cirino, P., Barth, A., Romain, M., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., . (2011). An experimental study of scheduling and duration of “Tier 2” first-grade reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 208–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Égré, P., & Klinedinst, N. (2011). Introduction: Vagueness and language use. In P. Egré, & N. Klinedinst (Eds.),Vagueness and language use. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P. (2012). How much therapy is enough? The impossible question!International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 432–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, M. E., Yoder, P., Warren, S. F., & Bredin-Oja, S. (2012). Is more better? Milieu Communication Teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C., Ebersbach, G., Ramig, L., & Sapir, S. (2012). LSVT LOUD and LSVT BIG: Behavioral treatment programs for speech and body movement in Parkinson Disease. Parkinson's Disease, 2012(Article ID 391946). doi:10.1155/2012/391946
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., . (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Available online at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/, (accessed 11 April 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Hinckley, J. J., & Carr, T. (2005). Comparing the outcomes of intensive and non-intensive context-based aphasia treatment. Aphasiology, 19, 965–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A. G. (2012). Pharmacological dosage concepts: How useful are they for educators and speech-language pathologists?International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 414–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Packman, A., Onslow, M., Simpson, J. M., & Jones, M. (2008). A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logemann, J. A. (2012). Clinical efficacy and randomized clinical trials in dysphagia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 443–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes, J., & Robin, D. A. (2012). A motor learning perspective for optimizing intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 447–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. E. (2009). Neuroplasticity and swallowing. Dysphagia, 24, 218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty, A. S., Breit-Smith, A., Fan, X., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2011). Does intensity matter? Preschoolers’ print knowledge development within a classroom-based intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Packman, A., & Onslow, M. (2012). Investigating optimal intervention intensity with the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 467–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsberger, G., & Marie, B. (2007). Self-administered cued naming therapy: A single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 343–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J., Bulter, S. G., Daniels, S. K., Gross, R. D., Langmore, S., Lazarus, C. L., . (2008). Swallowing and dysphagia rehabilitation: Translating principles of neural plasticity into clinically oriented evidence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, S276–S300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, N. (2012). Optimal dose-response relationships in voice therapy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. B., & Justice, L. M. (2012). Optimal intervention intensity for emergent literacy: What we know and need to learn. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 451–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, R. L., Johnson, A. F., Ruscello, D. M., & Arndt, W. B. (1978). Assessment of parent administered listening training for preschool children with articulation deficits. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 18, 242–254.
   Google Scholar
• To, C. K. S., Law, T., & Cheung, P. S. P. (2012). Treatment intensity in everyday clinical management of speech sound disorders in Hong Kong. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L. (2012). Challenges inherent in optimizing speech-language pathology outcomes: It’s not just about counting the hours.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Power, E., Riedijk, R., McDonald, S., & Tate, R. (2012). An exploration of participant experience of communication training programs for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1256–1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukrainetz, T. A., Ross, C. L., & Harm, H. M. (2009). An investigation of treatment scheduling for phonemic awareness with kindergartners who are at risk for reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 86–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. F., Fey, M. E., & Yoder, P. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2012). Intensity in phonological intervention: Is there a prescribed amount?International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., Fey, M. E., & Warren, S. F. (2012). Studying the impact of intensity is important but complicated. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 410–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, B., Law, J., & Lindsay, G. (2012). Characterizing optimal intervention intensity: The relationship between dosage and effect size in interventions for children with developmental speech and language difficulties. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar