Designs and decisions: The creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children

References

• Almost, D., & Rosenbaum, P. (1998). Effectiveness of speech intervention for phonological disorders: A randomised controlled trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association [APA], & National Council on Measurement in Education [NCME]. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E., & Bernhardt, B. (2004). From hindsight to foresight: Working around barriers to success in phonological intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 287–318.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E., & Munro, N. (2011). An overview of resources for assessing toddlers’ productions of polysyllables. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 13, 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bankson, N. W., & Bernthal, J. E. (1990). Bankson-Bernthal Test of Phonology. San Antonio, TX: Special Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bankson, N. W., Bernthal, J. E., & Flipsen, P. (2009). Phonological assessment procedures. In J. E. Bernthal, N. W. Bankson, & P. Flipsen (Eds.), Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children. (pp. 187–250). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, C. (2001). Phonological therapy: Children’s speech sound disorders (PHONO-TX. http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/phonologicaltherapy/.
   Google Scholar
• Crais, E. R. (2011). Testing and beyond: Strategies and tools for evaluating and assessing infants and toddlers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 341–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B., & McAllister, L. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research approaches. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 4, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, E., Howell, J., Hill, A., & Waters, D. (1990). Metaphon Resource Pack. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, S. L., & Hitchcock, E. R. (2010). Using standardized tests to inventory consonant and vowel production: A comparison of 11 tests of articulation and phonology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 488–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenfeld, S., Broen, P. A., & McGue, M. (1994). A 28-year follow up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: Educational and occupational results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1341–1353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friberg, J. C. (2010). Considerations for test selection: How do validity and reliability impact diagnostic decisions? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frytak, J. (2000). Measurement. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes, 4, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J., & Champion, A. H. (1999). Interacting error patterns and their resistance to treatment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13, 421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation-2. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (1997). The need to use polysyllabic words in the assessment and analysis of speech. Australian Communication Quarterly, Autumn, 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (2002). Part II: On assessing normal speech development. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 4, 148–150.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (2006). Hippopotamus is so hard to say: Children’s acquisition of polysyllabic words. Unpublished PhD, University of Sydney, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• James, D., van Doorn, J., & McLeod, S. (2008). The contribution of polysyllabic words in clinical decision making about children’s speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, V., & Pring, T. (2008). Children with phonological problems: A survey of clinical practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43, 154–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordaan, H. (2008). Clinical intervention for bilingual children: An international survey. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 60, 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of children’s speech: A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, L. M. (2002). The sixth view: Assessing preschoolers’ articulation and phonology from the trenches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 250–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., Boyle, J., Harris, F., Harkness, A., & Nye, C. (2000). Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: Findings from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 165–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2003). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD004110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leitão, S. (2011). My top 10 assessment resources (with a paediatric slant). ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 13, 94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, S., & Fletcher, J. (2004). Literacy outcomes for students with speech impairment: Long-term follow-up. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 245–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. J. (1996). Familiar strangers: Criterion-referenced measures in communication disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. J., & Strand, E. I. (2008). A review of standardised tests of nonverbal oral and speech motor performance in children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. J., & Swisher, L. (1984). Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 34–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCormack, J., McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McAllister, L. (2010). The impact of speech impairment in early childhood: Investigating parents’ and speech-language pathologists’ perspectives using the ICF-CY. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 378–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (2012). Translation to practice: Creating sampling tools to assess multilingual children’s speech. In S. McLeod, & B. A. Goldstein (Eds.), Multilingual aspects of speech sound disorders in children. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & Baker, E. (2004). Current clinical practice for children with speech impairment. In B. E. Murdoch, J. Goozee, B. M. Whelan, & K. Docking (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & Baker, E. (2012). Speech-language pathologists’ practices regarding assessment, analysis, target selection and intervention for children with speech sound disorder. [Manuscript in preparation].
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Hand, L., Rosenthal, J. B., & Hayes, B. (1994). The effect of sampling condition on children’s productions of consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 868–882.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison, J. A., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 259–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullen, R., & Schooling, T. (2010). The National Outcomes Measurement System for paediatric speech-language pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 44–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, L., Stackhouse, J., Goulandris, N., & Snowling, M. J. (2004a). The development of early literacy skills among children with speech difficulties: A test of the “critical age hypothesis”. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 377–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. D., Nygren, P., Walker, M., & Panoscha, R. (2006). Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics, 117, 298–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P. W., & Creaghead, N. A. (1985). Assessment of articulatory and phonological disorders. In N. A. Creaghead, P. W. Newman, & W. A. Secord (Eds.), Assessment and remediation of articulation and phonological disorders. (pp. 70–80). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Nova Development. (2006). Art Explosion Photo Objects 150,000. Calabasas, CA: Nova Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• PASW Statistics. (2009). Statistical Program for the Social Sciences (Version 17.0.2). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K. E. (1991). The identification of vowel errors using traditional articulation or phonological process test stimuli. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. (1995). A clinical screening procedure for assessing consonant cluster production. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Priester, G. H., Post, W. J., & Goorhuis-Brouwer, S. M. (2009). Problems in speech sound production in young children. An inventory study of the opinions of speech therapists. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73, 1100–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1985). Continuous speech sampling for phonologic analyses of speech-language delayed children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 323–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Snyder, T. (1989). Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: Stabilization phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 233–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Snyder, T. (1990). Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: Response evocation phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 635–655.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skahan, S. M., Watson, M., & Lof, G. L. (2007). Speech-language pathologists’ assessment practices for children with suspected speech sound disorders: Results of a national survey. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 246–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, T. J., Swartwout Szulga, M., & Figueroa, C. (2012). Using norm-referenced tests to determine severity of language impairment in children: Disconnect between U.S. policy makers and test developers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 176–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stow, C., & Dodd, B. (2003). Providing an equitable service to bilingual children in the UK: A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 351–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturner, R. A., Layton, T. L., Evans, A. W., Heller, J. H., Funk, S. G., & Machon, M. W. (1994). Preschool speech and language screening: A review of currently available tests. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, January, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Teverovsky, E. G., Bickel, J. O., & Feldman, H. M. (2009). Functional characteristics of children diagnosed with childhood apraxia of speech. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 94–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A., & Tolbert, L. C. (2002). Speech-language assessment in the clinical setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, D. K. (1988). Designing informal assessment procedures. In D. E. Yoder, & R. D. Kent (Eds.), Decision making in speech-language pathology. (pp. 192–193). Philadelphia, PA: B. C. Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & McLeod, S. (2012). Speech-language pathologists’ assessment and intervention practices with multilingual children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 292–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winitz, H. (1969). Articulatory acquisition and behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Wolk, L., & Meisler, A. W. (1998). Phonological assessment: A systematic comparison of conversation and picture naming. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 291–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, Y., & Roulstone, S. (2008). A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 346–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar