Problematic topic transitions in dysarthric conversation

References

• Ball, L. J., Fager, S., & Fried-Oken, M. (2012). Augmentative and alternative communication for people with progressive neuromuscular disease. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 23, 689–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson, A. (2014). Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: Some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. E., Candlin, C. N., & Ferguson, A. (2013). Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: a case study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 102–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in dysarthria: word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards, & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 38–55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2006). Trouble sources and repair in acquired dysarthria and communication aid use: A conversation analysis study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. (PhD), University of London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2013). Conversation and interaction in degenerative diseases. In K. M. Yorkston, R. M. Miller & Strand, E. A. (Eds.), Management of Speech and Swallowing in Degenerative Diseases, 3rd ed. (pp. 195–220). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The Understandability of AAC: A Conversation Analysis Study of Acquired Dysarthria. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2009). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 769–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 510–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Multiple troubles and repair in voice output communication aid-mediated interaction. In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction (pp. 95–126). Guildford: J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2009). Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmaitcs, 41, 974–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1984). Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 167–190). Paris: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic Nomination and Topic Pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1988/89). Topic Initiation: Business-at-Hand. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 22, 61–92.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children’s peer conversation: completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Markova, I. (1995). Complementarity in the construction of a problematic utterance in conversation. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in Dialogue (pp. 238–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Markova, I. (1999). Interaction between impaired and unimpaired speakers: Inter-subjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 339–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction (pp. 335–376). Amstersdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. J., & Joanette, Y. (1997). Analysis of conversational topic shifts: a multiple case study. Brain Lang, 58, 92–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., Barnes, R., Britten, N., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Investigating interactional competencies in Parkinson’s disease: the potential benefits of a conversation analytic approach. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., Barnes, R., Britten, N., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Potential Causes and Consequences of Overlap in Talk between Speakers with Parkinson’s Disease and Their Familiar Conversation Partners. Seminars in speech and language, 33, 27–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984a). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: studies in conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Paris: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984b). Transcript Notation. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the ‘hint and guess’ sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. G. (1980). Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica, 30, 263–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, J. B., Lubinski, R. B., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1996). Conversational repair by individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 39, 881–895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 7, 185–218.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 72, 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, B. (2009). Repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: A study in interactional phonetics. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 887–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, B. (2010). On the use of the term ‘repair’ and its application to disordered conversational speech. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Ferm, U., & Bloch, S. (2014). Semantic trouble sources and their repair in conversations affected by Parkinson’s disease. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 710–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., & Hartelius, L. (2011). Echolalia or functional repetition in conversation—a case study of an individual with Huntington’s disease. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 12, 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2013). Ten operations in self-inititated, same-turn repair. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 41–70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 13, 74–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellers, M. (2012). Prosodic variation for topic shift and other functions in local contrasts in conversation. Phonetica, 69, 231–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar