A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children

References

• Bang, M. (1991a). Picture this: How pictures work. New York: SeaStar.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M. (1991b). Picture this: Perception and composition. Boston, MA: Bulfinch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. M., Akaba, S., Brady, N. C., & Thiemann-Bourque, K. (2013). Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, J., LaRue, A., & Olejink, A. (1979). Sex-appropriate toy preference and the ability to conceptualize toys as sex-role related. Developmental Psychology, 15, 339–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1991). Language development from two to three. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., Merkin, S., & Wootten, J. (1982). Wh-questions: Linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition. Child Development, 53, 1084–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G., & Lloyd, L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented by five graphic symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. (1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development, 70, 1314–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (1976). Play and metalinguistic awareness. In J. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 105–177). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2003). Recursion through dictionary definition space: Concrete versus abstract words. School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton University. http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/concrete-abstract.pdf. Accessed 3rd, December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., Speltz, J., Fallon, K., & Jeffries, L. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 -Year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 173.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Lloyd, L. (1987). A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Goodwyn, F. D., Boles, M. M., Hong, E. R., Rispoli, M. J., Lund, E. M., et al. (2013). Impacts of a PECS instructional coaching intervention on practitioners and children with autism. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, C., & Rule, A. (2005). Preschoolers’ ideas of what makes a picture book illustration beautiful. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32, 283–290.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Let's go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning ‘for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2002). Improving the design of AAC technologies for young children. Assistive Technology, 14, 17–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager K. (2012). Effects of early AAC intervention on the communication skills of children with Down syndrome .Seminar presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012a). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012b). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., & Nemser, J. (2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., Curran, J., Hayes, E., Kristiansen, L., Lewis, W., et al. (2005). AAC interventions to maximize language development for you children. AAC-RERC Webcast. http://www.aac-rerc.com/pages/news/webcasts2005.htm#may1. Accessed 3rd, September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Patkin, L. (2007). Children’s ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Worah, S., Bowker, A., Burki, B., Drager, K., D’Silva, K., et al. (2008). Children’s representations of early language concepts: Implications for AAC symbols. Presentation at the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S., Miller, D., Herman, M., Hinds, A., & Light, J. (1998). Children’s representation of early emerging concepts: implications for AAC. Poster presented at ASHA, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Jonson R. (2008). The Picture Communication Symbols.Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in non-speaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning symbols represented by Bliss, Picture Communication Systems & Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & Ruscello, D. (1984). Transparency of three communication symbol sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninno, A. (2001). Pragmatic keywords and the first combining verbs in children's speech. Journal of Child Language, 21, 433–469.
   Google Scholar
• Pitz, H. (1963). Illustrating Children's Books: History-technique-production. New York: Weston-Guptill Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., Pine, J., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: Re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language, 30, 609–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Laubscher, E. H., Schlosser, R. W., Flynn, S., Sorce, J. F., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2007). The effect of color on the recognition and use of line drawings by children with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromswold, K. (1995). Acquisition of subject and object wh-questions. Language Acquisition, 4, 5–48.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A., et al. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., & Jagartoo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar