Using network science in the language sciences and clinic

References

• Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. D., & Byrd, C. T. (2008). Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 851–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, K., Wolter, J. A., & Masterson, J. J. (2006). Effects of Phonotactic and Orthotactic Probabilities During Fast Mapping on 5-Year-Olds’ Learning to Spell. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 21–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbesman, S., Strogatz, S. H., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). The Structure of Phonological Networks Across Multiple Languages. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 20, 679–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. S., Conture, E. G., & Ohde, R. N. (2005). Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter: preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 125–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. L. (2009). Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science, 325, 412–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronchelli, A., Ferrer i Cancho, R., Pastor-Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Networks in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 348–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; San Jose, CA, pp. 361–362.
   Google Scholar
• Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1988). Pajek – Program for large network analysis. Connections, 21, 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Beckage, N., Smith, L., & Hills, T. (2011). Small Worlds and Semantic Network Growth in Typical and Late Talkers. PLoS ONE, 6, e19348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonte, M. L., Poelmans, H., & Blomert, L. (2007). Deviant neurophysiological responses to phonological regularities in speech in dyslexic children. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1427–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a network. Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory, 12, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, A. L., Schuell, H., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Effect of word frequency and word length on aphasic spelling errors. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 7, 183–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butts, C. T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science, 325, 414–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2009). The Influence of the Phonological Neighborhood Clustering-Coefficient on Spoken Word Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1934–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34, 685–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (in press). The influence of neighborhood density on the recognition of Spanish-accented words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, J., & Liu, H. (2014). Approaching human language with complex networks. Physics of Life Reviews, 11, 598–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N.O. Schiller, & A.S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. New York: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., & Champion, A. H. (1999). Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 26, 261–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Larson, M. (2008). Phonotactic probability influences speech production. Cognition, 107, 1155–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, R., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2014). The influence of clustering coefficient on word-learning: how groups of similar sounding words facilitate acquisition. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 5, 1307.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain & Language, 82, 113–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2001). Phonological neighborhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist models. Brain and Language, 79, 21–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., Brinkley, S., & Svetina, D. (2012). Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: Effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1289–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sounds system of American English. Word, 20, 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., & Smith, L. B. (2010). The Associative Structure of Language: Contextual Diversity in Early Word Learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 63, 259–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., Sheya, A., & Smith, L. B. (2009). Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: Preferential attachment or preferential acquisition? Psychological Science, 20, 729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Last in, first to go: Age of acquisition and naming in the elderly. Brain and Language, 64, 146–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, C. R. (2013). Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 127, 463–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 896–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. R. S., Madhavan, C. E. V., Zweig, K. A., & Natarajan, A. (2012). Understanding human navigation using network analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 121–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A. R., Kirk, K. I., Lachs, L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2003). Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 46, 390–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., Wechsler-Kashi, D., Kenett, D. Y., Schwartz, R. G., Ben-Jacob, E., & Faust, M. (2013). Semantic organization in children with cochlear implants: Computational analysis of verbal fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, 845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lallini, N., & Miller, N. (2011). Do phonological neighbourhood density and phonotactic probability influence speech output accuracy in acquired speech impairment? Aphasiology, 25, 176–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Davis, J., Deevy, P. (2007). Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 747–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacRoy-Higgins, M., Schwartz, R. G., Shafer, V. L., & Marton, K. (2013). Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 188–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 465–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 306–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 65–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Brecher, A., Walker, G. M., Sobel, P., Dell, G. S., et al. (2010). A large, searchable, web-based database of aphasic performance on picture naming and other tests of cognitive function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, J. M., & Solé, R. V. (2002). Small world patterns in food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 214, 405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The Effect of Phonological Neighborhood Density on Vowel Articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89, 208701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Mitterer, H., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Deviant neural processing of phonotactic probabilities in adults with dyslexia. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 24, 746–750.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (2002). Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language, 81, 666–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, C. S. Q. (2013). Community structure in the phonological network. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, C. S. Q., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2014). Spoken word recognition and serial recall of words from components in the phonological network. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S. (1996). The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contributions to age-related declines in spoken word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 11, 333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporns, O. (2010). Networks of the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamer, M. K., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2012). Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 15, 490–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. (2005). The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2011). Differentiating word learning processes may yield new insights. Journal of Child Language, 38, 51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2010a). An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2010b). Word learning by children with phonological delays: Differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 105–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2011). The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 38, 628–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 191–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1175–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, L., Tan, S. H., Yap, M. J., & Goh, W. D. (2011). Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 51, 408–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Goldstein, R. (2014). Keywords in the mental lexicon. Journal of Memory & Language, 73, 131–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological Neighborhood Effects in Spoken Word Perception and Production. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31, 491–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 760–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Storkel, H. L. (2013). Examining the acquisition of phonological word forms with computational experiments. Language & Speech, 56, 491–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Armbruster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 514–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Goldstein, R. (2014). Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 1–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., & Roodenrys, S. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 67, 30–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Ercal, G., & Adagarla, B. (2011). Simulating retrieval from a highly clustered network: Implications for spoken word recognition. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 2, 369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Goldstein, R., & Johnson, E. (in press). In A. Mehler, P. Blanchard, B. Job, & S. Banish (Eds.), Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks. Springer (Understanding Complex Systems series).
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Pisoni, D. B., Kirk, K. I., Hay-McCutcheon, M., & Yount, S. L. (2002). Effects of phonotactic probabilities on the processing of spoken words and nonwords by postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants. Volta Review, 102, 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 409–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster–s Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. (1967). Los Angeles: Library Reproduction Service.
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M., Locker, L., Jr., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L., & Hammond, M. (2004). Phonotactic probabilities in young children’s speech production. Journal of Child Language, 31, 515–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psycho-Biology of Language. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar