Applying genetic techniques to study remote shark fisheries in northeastern Madagascar

References

• Abercrombie D. 2004. Efficient PCR-based identification of shark products in global trade: Applications for the management and conservation of commercially important mackerel sharks (Family Lamnidae), thresher sharks (Family Alopiidae) and hammerhead sharks (Family Sphyrnidae), MS Thesis, Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, Dania Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Abercrombie DL, Clarke SC, Shivji MS. 2005. Global-scale genetic identification of hammerhead sharks: Application to assessment of the international fin trade and law enforcement. Conserv Genet. 6:775–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke SC, McAllister MK, Milner-Gulland EJ, Kirkwood GP, Michielsens CGJ, Agnew DJ, Pikitch EK, Nakano H, Shivji MS. Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. Ecol Lett. 2006a; 9:1115–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke SC, Magnussen JE, Abercrombie DL, McAllister M, Shivji MS. Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market using molecular genetics and trade records. Conserv Biol. 2006b; 20:201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukakis P, Jonahson M, Ramahery V, Randriamanantsoa BJD. 2007. Traditional fisheries of Antongil Bay, Madagascar. West Indian Ocean J Mar Sci. 6 2: 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• du Feu TA. 1998. Fisheries statistics for the large meshed gill net fishery, North West Madagascar, Internal report of the Promotion de la Pêche Maritime Traditionelle et Artisanale, September, p 75 (available from author).
   Google Scholar
• Ersts PJ, Rosenbaum HC. 2003. Habitat preference reflects social organization of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on a wintering ground. J Zool. 204 4: 337–345.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270:313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes BH, Steinke D, Ward RD. 2009. Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding. Fish Res. 95:280–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of threatened species, Version 2010.2 [Online] Available at www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 15 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, DeWaard JR, Hebert PDN. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:998–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova N, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:544–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Razafimahatratra V, Guillery RP, Rakotomalala J, Weiss A, Ratsisompatrarivo J-S. 1999. Designing the Masoala National Park in Madagascar based on biological and socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol. 13 5: 1055–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan TR. 2006. Testing for correspondence between coral reef invertebrate diversity and marine park designation on the Masoala Peninsula of eastern Madagascar. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 17 4: 409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVean AR, Walker RCJ, Fanning E. 2006. The traditional shark fisheries of southwest Madagascar: A study in the Toliara region. Fish Res. 82:280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Meth Enzymol. 101:20–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RA, Baum JK, Shepherd TD. 2007. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science. 315:1846–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pank M, Stanhope M, Natanson L, Kohler N, Shivji M. 2001. Rapid and simultaneous identification of body parts from the morphologically similar sharks Carcharhinus obscurus and Carcharhinus plumbeus (Carcharhinidae) using multiplex PCR. Mar Biotechnol. 3:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers SP, Peterson CH, Shivji MS. 2010. DNA forensic applications in shark management and conservation. In: Carrier JC, Heithaus MR, Musick JA. editors. Sharks and their relatives II: Biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press593–610.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivji M, Clarke S, Pank M, Natanson L, Kohler N, Stanhope M. 2002. Genetic identification of pelagic shark body parts for conservation and trade-monitoring. Conserv Biol. 16:1036–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale MJ. 1998. Evaluation of shark populations around the Masoala Peninsular, North East Madagascar, Final Report. Wildlife Conservation Society, Madagascar Country Programme, Antananarivo, May, p 40.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA. 2000. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci. 57 3: 476–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Holmes BH, Zemlak TS, Smith PJ. 2007. DNA barcoding discriminates spurdogs of the genus Squalus. In: Last PR, White WT, Pogonoski JJ. editors. Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea: Squalidae). Hobart: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 014117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Holmes BH, White WT, Last PR. 2008. DNA barcoding Australian chondrichthyans: Results and potential uses in conservation. Mar Freshw Res. 59:57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong EH-K, Shivji MS, Hanner RH. 2009. Identifying sharks with DNA barcodes: Assessing the utility of a nucleotide diagnostic approach. Mol Ecol Resour. 9 s1: 243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar