Barcoding, types and the Hirudo files: Using information content to critically evaluate the identity of DNA barcodes

References

• Bely AE, Weisblat DA. 2006. Lessons from leeches: A call for DNA barcoding in the lab. Evol Dev. 8:491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besansky NJ, Severson DW, Ferdig MT. 2003. DNA barcoding of parasites and invertebrate disease vectors: What you don't know can hurt you. Trends Parasitol. 19:545–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 3:148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Borda E, Oceguera-Figueroa A, Siddall ME. 2008. On the classification, evolution and biogeography of terrestrial haemodipsoid leeches (Hirudinida: Arhyncobdellida: Hirudiniformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 46:142–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R. 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: Response to Rubinoff. Conserv Biol. 20:1545–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall ME. 2005. The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc B. 360:1905–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit P, Rota E, Erséus C. 2009. Grania (Annelida: Clitellata: Enchytraeidae) of the great barrier reef, Australia, including four new species and a re-description of Grania trichaeta Jamieson, 1977. Zootaxa. 2165:16–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ebach MC, Holdredge C. 2005. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy?. Nature. 434:697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández J, Stent GS. 1982. Embryonic development of the hirudinid leech Hirudo medicinalis: Structure, development and segmentation of the germinal plate. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 72:71–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Hoch PC, McCook LM. 1992. Documenting scientific data: The need for voucher specimens. Ann MO Bot Gard. 79:969–970.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54:852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwach W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 12:14812–14817.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter SJ, Goodall TI, Walsh KA, Owen R, Day JC. 2008. Nondestructive DNA extraction from blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae): Retaining voucher specimens for DNA barcoding projects. Mol Ecol Resources. 8:56–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. p 306.
   Google Scholar
• Jördens J, Struck T, Purschke G. 2004. Phylogenetic inference regarding Parergodrilidae and Hrabeiella periglandulata (“Polychaeta”, Annelida) based on 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA and COX1 sequences. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 42:270–280.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvist S, Dreyer J, Erséus C. 2008. Two new species of Tubificoides (Annelida: Clitelata: Naididae) from the Blake Ridge methane seep in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 121:531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist S, Sarkar IN, Erséus C. 2010. Genetic variation and phylogeny of the cosmopolitan marine genus Tubificoides (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae: Tubificinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 57:687–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23:2947–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturaeRegnum animale Vol. 1. 10th rev. ed. L. Salvii, Holmiae.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SE. 2007. DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:4775–4776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moquin-Tandon A. 1827. Monographie de la famille des Hirudinées Montpellier. France: Maison de Commerce. p 141.
   Google Scholar
• Muller KJ, Nicholls JG, Stent GS. editors. 1981. Neurobiology of the leech. In: Cold spring harbor. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p 255.
   Google Scholar
• Neigel J, Domingo A, Stake J. 2007. DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation. Coral Reefs. 26:487–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson K-H, Köljalg U. 2006. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequence databases: A fungal perspective. PLoS ONE. 1:e59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oceguera-Figueroa A, Léon-Règagnon V, Siddall ME. 2005. Phylogeny and revision of Erpobdelliformes (Annelida, Arhyncobdellida) from Mexico based on nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Rev Mex Biod. 76:191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Pleijel F, Jondelius U, Norlinder E, Nygren A, Oxelman B, Schander C, Sundberg P, Tholleson M. 2008. Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:369–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid GM. 2009. Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778): His life, philosophy and science and its relationship to modern biology and medicine. Taxon. 58:18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ross HA, Murugan S. 2006. Using phylogenetic analyses and reference datasets to validate the species identities of cetacean sequences in GenBank. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:866–871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowley DL, Coddington JA, Gates MW, Norrbom AL, Ochoa RA, Vandenberg NJ, Greenstone MH. 2007. Vouchering DNA-barcoded specimens: Test of a nondestructive extraction protocol for terrestrial arthropods. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:915–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schander C, Willassen E. 2005. What can biological barcoding do for marine biology?. Mar Biol Res. 1:78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Siddall ME, Trontelj P, Utevsky SY, Nkamany M, Macdonald KSIII. 2007. Diverse molecular data demonstrate that commercially available medicinal leeches are not Hirudo medicinalis. Proc R Soc B. 274:1481–1487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddall ME, Fontanella FM, Watson SC, Kvist S, Erséus C. 2009. Barcoding bamboozled by bacteria: Convergence to metazoan primer targets by marine microbes. Syst Biol. 58:445–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP^*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (^*and other methods), ver. 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trontelj P, Utevsky SY. 2005. Celebrity with a neglected taxonomy: Molecular systematics of the medicinal leech (genus Hirudo). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 34:616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker IS, Izadi D, Oliver DW, Monteath G, Butler PE. 2004. Hirudo medicinalis and the plastic surgeon. Br J Plast Surg. 57:348–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiemers M, Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist?—A case study in the blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front Zool. 4:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will KW, Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics. 20:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams ST, Knowlton N. 2001. Mitochondrial pseudogenes are pervasive and often insidious in the snapping shrimp genus Alpheus. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1484–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54:844–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar