FISH-BOL and seafood identification: Geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada

References

• Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri E, Labra M, Malandra R, Galli P, Casiraghi M. 2010. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp.). Food Res Int. 43:376–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter JS, Taylor EB, Devlin RH, Hagen J, McPhail JD. 1997. Evidence for natural hybridization between Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in a northcentral British Columbia watershed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54:421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker S, Hanner R, Steinke D. 2011. Five years FISH-BOL: Brief status report. Mitochondrial DNA. 22 Suppl 1: 3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caddy J, Garibaldi L. 2000. Apparent changes in the trophic composition of wild marine harvest: The perspective from FAO capture database. Ocean Coast Manag. 43:615–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow S, Kishino H. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships between tuna species of the genus Thunnus (Scombridae: Teleostei): Inconsistent implications from morphology, nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol. 41:741–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, White KD, Thompson TM, Wahl M, Pham TD, Guichard FM, Huh I, Austin C, Dizikes G, Gerber SI. 2009. Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Prot. 72:810–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck AJ, Sumaila UR. 2010. Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. J Bioecon. 12:227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Eytan RI, Hellberg ME. 2010. Nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data reveal and conceal different demographic histories and population genetic processes in Caribbean reef fishes. Evolution. 64:3380–3397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy SM, Deeds JR, Ivanova NV, Hanner R, Hebert PDN, Ormos A, . 2011. A single laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J AOAC Int. 94:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DJ. 2003. Can you bank on GenBank?. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:317–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April A, Bernatchez L.. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE. 3:e2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, De Waard JR, Hebert PDN. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:998–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:544–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet J, Pauly D. 2008. Trade secrets: Renaming and mislabeling of seafood. Mar Policy. 32:309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet J, Pauly D, Ainley D, Holt S, Dayton P, Jackson J. 2010. Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature. 467:28–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan CA, Alter SE, Haupt AJ, Tomalty K, Palumbi SR. 2008. An impediment to consumer choice: Overfished species are sold as Pacific red snapper. Biol Conserv. 141:1591–1599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO. 2009. The real maccoyii: Identifying tuna sushi with DNA barcodes: Contrasting characteristics attributes and genetic distances. PLoS ONE. 4:e7866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein JH, Osmundson TW, Becker S, Hanner R, Stiassny MLJ. 2011. Incorporating DNA barcodes into a multi-year inventory of the fishes of the hyperdiverse Lower Congo River, with a multi-gene performance assessment of the genus Labeo as a case study. Mitochondrial DNA. 22 Suppl 1: 52–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marko PB, Lee SC, Rice AM, Gramling JM, Fitzhenry TM, McAlister JS, Harper GR, Moran AL. 2004. Mislabelling of a depleted reef fish. Nature. 430:309–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol. 101:20–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DD, Mariani S. 2010. Smoke, mirrors, and mislabeled cod: Poor transparency in the European seafood industry. Front Ecol Environ. 8:517–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwani CD, Becker S, Braid HE, Ude EF, Okogwu OI, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeographic resolution within some species. Mitochondrial DNA. 22 Suppl 1: 43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding of commercially important Salmon and Trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J Agric Food Chem. 57:8379–8385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hanner RH. 2010. A multiplex PCR method for the identification of commercially important Salmon and Trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) in North America. J Food Sci. 75:C595–C606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert P. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364 (www.barcoding.life.org).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PJ, McVeagh MS, Steinke D. 2008. Application of DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products. J Fish Biol. 72:464–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinke D, Hanner R. 2011. The FISH-BOL collaborators' protocol. Mitochondrial DNA. 22 Suppl 1: 10–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinke D, Zemlak TS, Boutillier JA, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding Pacific Canada's fishes. Mar Biol. 156:2641–2647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viñas J, Tudela S. 2009. Validated methodology for genetic identification of tuna species (genus Thunnus). PLoS ONE. 4:e7606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol. 74:329–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Wilde L, Norman J, Robertson J, Sarre S, Georges A. 2010. Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) gene. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 6:233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong EHK, Hanner R. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int. 41:828–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong E, Shivji MS, Hanner RH. 2009. Identifying sharks with DNA barcodes: Assessing the utility of a nucleotide diagnostic approach. Mol Ecol Res. 9:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA, Washington JD, Tenge BJ, Nguyen N-L, . 2008. The potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: Applications of the Regulatory Fish Encyclopedia. J Food Prot. 71:210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar