Low resolution of mitochondrial COI barcodes for identifying species of the genus Larus (Charadriiformes: Laridae)

References

• Aliabadian M, Kaboli M, Nijman V, Vences M. 2009. Molecular identification of birds: Performance of distance-based DNA barcoding in three genes to delimit parapatric species. PLoS ONE. 4:e4119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower AVZ. 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: ‘Ten species’ of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Syst Biodivers. 4:127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WM, George MJr, Wilson AC. 1979. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:1967–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J, Gochfeld M. 1996. Family Laridae (Gulls). In: Hoyo JD, Elliot A, Sagatal J. editors. Handbook of the birds of the world (Volume 3): Hoatzin to auks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions572–623.
   Google Scholar
• Caccone A, Gentile G, Burns CE, Sezzi E, Bergman W, Ruelle M, Saltonstall K, Powell JR. 2004. Extreme difference in rate of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA evolution in a large ectotherm, Galapagos tortoises. Mol Phyl Evol. 31:794–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J. 2006. DNA barcodes: Recent successes and future prospects. Heredity. 97:254–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri E, Barbuto M, Bain O, Galimberti A, Uni S, Guerrero R, Ferté H, Bandi C, Martin C, Casiraghi M. 2009. Integrated taxonomy: Traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda). Front Zool. 6:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frézal L, Leblois R. 2008. Four years of DNA barcoding: Current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol. 8:727–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:968–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54:852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003a; 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, DeWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003b; 270:S596–S599.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004a; 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2004b; 2 e312: 1657–1663.
   Google Scholar
• Hickerson MJ, Meyer CP, Moritz C. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species. Syst Biol. 55:729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg ID, Hebert PDN. 2004. Biological identification of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) from the Canadian arctic, using DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 82:749–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns GC, Avise JC. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol. 15:1481–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen A, Rindal E, Ericson PGF, Zuccon D, Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Lifjeld JT. 2010. DNA barcoding of Scandinavian birds reveals divergent lineages in trans-Atlantic species. J Ornithol. 151:565–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, Hebert PDN. 2007. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr KC, Birks SM, Kalyakin MV, Red'kin YA, Koblik EA, Hebert PD. 2009. Filling the gap – COI barcode resolution in eastern Palearctic birds. Front Zool. 6:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klicka J, Zink RM. 1997. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: A failed paradigm. Science. 277:1666–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebers D, de Knijff P, Helbig AJ. 2004. The herring gull complex is not a ring species. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:893–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz MV, Nielsen R. 2005. A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data. Phil Trans R Soc B. 360:1969–1974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA Barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3:e422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Huddleston CJ, Miranda HC, Knight A, Sawchuk SJ, Yuri T. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA. In: Mindell DP. editors. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. New York: Academic Press214–247.
   Google Scholar
• Moore WS. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:718–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz C, Cicero C. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:e354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons JM, Hassanin A, Crochet PA. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships within the Laridae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from mitochondrial markers. Mol Phyl Evol. 37:686–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons T, Gonzalez B, Ceciliani F, Galizzi A. 2006. FlgM anti-sigma factors: Identification of novel members of the family, evolutionary analysis, homology modeling, and analysis of sequence-structure-function relationships. J Mol Model. 12:973–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor, Available at http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckle MY. 2003. Taxonomy, DNA and the bar code of life. BioScience. 53:2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP^*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (^*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares ES, Baker AJ. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evol Biol. 8:81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4879–4882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won PO. 2003. The birds of Korea. Seoul: Kyohaksa461 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Yoo HS, Eah JY, Kim JS, Kim YJ, Min MS, Paek WK, Lee H, Kim CB. 2006. DNA barcoding Korean birds. Mol Cells. 22:323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar