Risk factors for mastectomy flap necrosis following immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction

References

• Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5203–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1362–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2007. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2554–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3437–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:320e–6e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1014–25; discussion 1026–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 2008;247:1019–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KY, Johns FR, Gibson J, et al. An outcome study of breast reconstruction: presurgical identification of risk factors for complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:586–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:467–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Mioton LM, Fine NA, Bilimoria KY, Kim JY. A predictive model of risk and outcomes in tissue expander reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 9,786 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013;47(6):513–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila AA, Seth AK, Wang E, et al. Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: a multivariate comparative analysis of short-term complications based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. Arch Plast Surg 2013;36:19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rambachan A, Mioton L, Saha S, et al. The impact of surgical duration on plastic surgery outcomes. Eur J Plast Surg 2013;36:707–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mlodinow AS, Ver Halen JP, Lim S, Nguyen KT, Gaido JA, Kim JY. Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71(4):335–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1886–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll SS. The early management of flap necrosis in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:893–901.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett SP, Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, et al. Management of exposed, infected implant-based breast reconstruction and strategies for salvage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1270–7.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby MA, Dong W, Feng L, Kronowitz SJ. Effect of intraoperative saline fill volume on perioperative outcomes in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1065–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padubidri AN, Yetman R, Browne E, et al. Complications of postmastectomy breast reconstructions in smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:342–9; discussion 350–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsolle V, Grinfeder C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Faucher A. Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:1017–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Use of tumescent mastectomy technique as a risk factor for native breast skin flap necrosis following immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2011;201:160–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, et al. Additive risk of tumescent technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:3041–6.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott AM, Miller BT, Tuttle TM. Outcomes after tumescence technique versus electrocautery mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2607–11.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver WM, Hazen A, Levine JP, et al. Reliable assessment of skin flap viability using orthogonal polarization imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:553.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg 2004;139:988–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Losken A, Stylbo TM, Schaefer TG, et al. The use of fluorescein dye as a predictor of mastectomy skin flap viability following autologous tissue reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:24–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:49–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meretoja TJ, Rasia S, con Smitten KA, et al. Late results of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2007;94:1220–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin SJ, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, et al. Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:16–19; discussion 19–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Dahl MB, Graversen HP. [Effects of tobacco smoking on the incidence of flap necrosis after mastectomy]. Ugeskr Laeger 1997;159:4974–6; Danish.
   Google Scholar
• Waeber B, Schaller MD, Nussberger J, et al. Skin blood flow and cigarette smoking: the role of vasopressin. Clin Exp Hypertens Part A 1984;6:2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waeber B, Schaller MD, Nussberger J, et al. Skin blood flow reduction induced by cigarette smoking: the role of vasopressin. Am J Physiol 1984;247:H895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JB, Fenske NA. Cutaneous manifestations and consequences of smoking (comments). J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:717.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worland RG. Expanded utilization of the tumescent technique for mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow M, Staradub VL. Modified radical mastectomy with knife technique. Arch Surg 2002;137:105–10.
   Google Scholar
• Myers MB, Brock D, Cohn I Jr. Prevention of skin slough after radical mastectomy by use of a vital dye to delineate devascularized skin. Ann Surg 1971;173:9220–4.
   Google Scholar
• Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, et al. Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery 1992;112:293–7; discussion 297–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstein AD, Phillips TJ, Rogers GS, Gilchrest BA. Wound healing and aging. Dermatol Clin 1993;11:749–57; Review.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kerkhof PC, Van Bergen B, Spruijt K, Kuiper JP. Age-related changes in wound healing. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994;19:369–74; Review.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson DL, Basir Z, Bruce T. Is oncologic safety compatible with a predictably viable mastectomy skin flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefer RA Jr, DuBois JJ, Ostrow LB, Silver LS. Wound complications following modified radical mastectomy: an analysis of perioperative factors. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1990;90:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer HR, Losken A. Predicting mastectomy skin flap necrosis with indocyanine green angiography: the gray area defined. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1043–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar