Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Impact on disability and quality of life

References

• Rowland LP, Schneider NA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1688–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Communication effectiveness of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Commun Disord. 2004;37:197–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth CR, Gleze LE, Goding GS Jr, David WS. Spasmodic dysphonia symptoms as initial presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Voice. 1996;10:362–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomik B, Guiloff RJ. Dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2008;00:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RG, Jackson CE, Kasarskis EJ, England JD, Forshew D, Johnston W, et al. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter update: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: drug, nutritional, and respiratory therapies (an evidence based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2009;73:1218–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Fager S, Nordness A. Communication Support for People with ALS. Neurol Res Int. 2011; 2011:714693.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fager S, Beukelman DR, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, Baker J. Access interface strategies. Assist Technol. 2011; 24:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligari M. Environmental control and alternative augmentative communication in severe motor disability. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2009;31:79–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ball LJ, Nordness AS, Fager SK, Kersch K, Mohr B, Pattee GL, Beukelman DR. Eye gaze access to AAC technology for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;18:11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball LJ, Fager S, Fried-Oken M. Augmentative and a lternative communication for people with progressive neuromuscular disease. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2012;23:689–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Filippi L. Puntatori oculari: per essere ancora ‘connessi’ col mondo (dissertation). Milano (Italy): Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B, Nakanishi A. The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci. 1999;169:13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasarskis EJ, Dempsey-Hall L, Thompson MM, Luu LC, Mendiondo M, Kryscio R. Rating the severity of ALS by caregivers over the telephone using the ALSFRS-R. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2005;6:50–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann P, Levy G, Montes J, Buchsbaum R, Barsdorf AI, Battista V, et al. Excellent inter-rater, intra-rater, and telephone-administered reliability of the ALSFRS-R in a multicentre clinical trial. QALS study group. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2007;8:42–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels RD, de Witte L, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Perrson, J, Oberg, et al. IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technol Disabil. 2000;13:105–15.
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: state of the art and future directions. Augment Altern Commun.1988;4:66–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Persson J, Lorentsen O, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Oortwijn, et al. IPPA: individually prioritized problem assessment. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:141–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil. 2002;14:107–11.
   Google Scholar
• Day H, Campbell K. Is telephone assessment a valid tool in rehabilitation research and practice?. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25:1126–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:101–5.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011;12:318–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Acceptance of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology by Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:113–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, Fox L, Rau MT, Tullman J, Baker G, Hindal M, et al. Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22:209–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J. Communication strategies with of people with ALS and their partners. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004;5:212–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy P, Yorkson K, Gutmann M. Augmentative Communication for Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. In: Beukelman D, Yorkston K, Reichle J, editors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Adults with Acquired Neurologic Disorders. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes; 2000. p. 183–232.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:230–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee A, Palovcak M. The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:445–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trioschi D, Bitelli C, Hoogerwerf EJ, Tanzini D. AAC and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a literature review and aspects of quality of life and service delivery. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen AL, editors. Assistive Technology from Adapted Equipment to Inclusive Environments. AAATE 2009. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009. p. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle M, Phillips B. Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augment Altern Comm. 2001;17:167–78.
   Google Scholar
• Robarge K. Communication management in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the role of the speech-language pathologist during disease progression. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2009;7:[about 6 p.]. Avaiable from: http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/Vol7Num2/robarge.htm
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J, Groszyk L. ‘Don’t give up’: employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2001;17:179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Nordness AS, Ball LJ, Fager S, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Late AAC assessment for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2010; 18:48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Spencer KA, Duffy JR. Behavioural management of respiratory/phonatory dysfunction from dysarthria: a systematic review of the evidence. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;11:13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RG, Jackson CE, Kasarskis EJ, England JD, Forshew D, Johnston W, et al. Practice parameter update: The care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: multidisciplinary care, symptom management, and cognitive/behavioural impairment (an evidence based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2009;73: 1227–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar