Assessment of asymmetry in pelvic motion – An inter- and intra-examiner reliability study

References

• Egan DA, Al-Eisa E. Pelvic skeletal asymmetry, postural control and the association with low back pain. A review of the evidence. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1991;25: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Eisa E, Egan DA, Fenety A. The association between lateral pelvic tilt and asymmetry in sitting pressure distribution. J Man Manip Ther. 2004;12:133–42.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Wassersug R. Fluctuating asymmetry and low back pain. Evol Hum Behav. 2004;25:31–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Deluzio K, Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: Three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain. Spine. 2006;31:71–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Deluzio K, Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic asymmetry and low back pain on trunk kinematics during sitting: A comparison with standing. Spine. 2006;31: 135–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent-Smith B, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra- examiner reliability of the standing flexion test. Man Ther. 1999;4:87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter NA, Rothstein JM. Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Phys Ther. 1985; 65:1671–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijne W, van Neerbos K, Aufdemkampe G, van der Wurff P. Reliability of the Gillet Test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiostereometric analysis of movements of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test. Spine. 2000;25:364–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael JP. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpation for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10:164–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backgård S. Intra- and interreliability when experienced physiotherapists assess SI-joint mobility in a patient population. Master Thesis, Department of Neuroscience, Section of Physiotherapy, University of Uppsala; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine. 1996;15;21: 1889–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn FM. Manuell Mobilisering av ryggraden. Oslo: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D. The Pelvic Girdle. An approach to the examination and treatment of the lumbopelvic hip-region.3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Arab AM, Abdollahi I, Joghataei MT, Golafshani Z, Kazemnejad A. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint. Man Ther. 2009;14:213–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenman P E. Clinical aspects of the sacroiliac function in walking. J Manual Med. 1990;5:125–30.
   Google Scholar
• Greenman P E. Clinical Aspects of the sacroiliac joint in walking. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckhart R, editors. Movement, stability and low back pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997:235–41.
   Google Scholar
• Riegger-Krugh C, Keysor JJ. Skeletal malalignments of the lower quarter: Correlated and compensatory motions and postures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23:164–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introduction to SAS. UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. Available at: www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/kappa.htm. Accessed November 24, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. 4th ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz C. Application and evaluation of the kappa statistic in the design and interpretation of chiropractic clinical research. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:521–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: An evidence-based perspective Phys Ther. 2001;81:1546–64.
   Google Scholar
• Stovall BA, Kumar S. Anatomical landmark asymmetry assessment in the lumbar spine and pelvis: A review of reliability. PMR. 2010;2:48–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapandji IA. The physiology of the joints. Volume Three. The trunk and the vertebral column. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1974.
   Google Scholar