Auditory processing disorder (APD) in children: A marker of neurodevelopmental syndrome

References

• Hind SE, Haines-Bazrafshan R, Benton CL, Brassington W, Towle B, Moore DR. Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50:708–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAA. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder 2010. Available from: http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/CAPD%20Guidelines%208-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, Cameron S, Glyde H, Wilson W, Tomlin D. An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23: 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR, Rosen S, Bamiou DE, Campbell NG, Sirimanna T. Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): a British Society of Audiology APD special interest group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2013;52:3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling MJ. Editorial: seeking a new characterization of learning disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSA. Position statement: Auditory processing disorder (APD) 2011. 1–9. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/images/stories/docs/BSA_APD_PositionPaper_31March11_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norena AJ, Farley BJ. Tinnitus-related neural activity: theories of generation, propagation, and centralization. Hear Res. 2013;295:161–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood LJ, Brashears S, Long G, Talmadge C. Understanding subtle changes in auditory function with otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133:3376. doi: 10.1121/1.4805801. PMID:23655137[PubMed - in process] http://www.merriam-webster.com/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson EW. Tuning forks to audiometers and back again. The Laryngoscope. 1970;80:49–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham AJ, Bacon SP. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear. 2003;24:352–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 6th edn. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter LL, Margolis RH, Rykken JR, Le CT, Daly KA, Giebink GS. High frequency hearing loss associated with otitis media. Ear Hear. 1996;17:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel JS, Roberts JE, Roush J, Grose J, Besing J, Burchinal M, et al. Early otitis media with effusion, hearing loss, and auditory processes at school age. Ear Hear. 2006;27:353–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri R, Siegel JH, Wright BA. Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;129:852–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell NG, Bamiou DE, Sirimanna T. Current progress in auditory processing disorder. ENT & Audiol News. 2012; 21:86–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley DE, Hill PR, Moore DR. The auditory basis of language impairments: temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(Suppl 1):S137–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hill PR, Hartley DE, Glasberg BR, Moore BC, Moore DR. Auditory processing efficiency and temporal resolution in children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47:1022–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley DE, Moore DR. Effects of otitis media with effusion on auditory temporal resolution. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:757–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Plack CJ, Biswas AK. The shape of the ear’s temporal window. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;83: 1102–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley DE, Moore DR. Auditory processing efficiency deficits in children with developmental language impairments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:2962–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anastasio AR, Momensohn-Santos TM. Synthetic sentence identification (SSI) and contralateral acoustic stapedius reflex. Pro-fono: revista de atualizacao cientifica. 2005;17:355–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higson JM, Morgan N, Stephenson H, Haggard MP. Auditory performance and acoustic reflexes in young adults reporting listening difficulties. Br J Audiol. 1996; 30: 381–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrsic T, Reisinger E, Moser T. Otoferlin: a multi-C2 domain protein essential for hearing. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:671–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Parbery-Clark A, Kraus N. Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:4357–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbery-Clark A, Anderson S, Kraus N. Musicians change their tune: how hearing loss alters the neural code. Hear Res. 2013;302:121–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornickel J, Zecker SG, Bradlow AR, Kraus N. Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:16731–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Kraus N. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci. 2012;32:14156–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran B, Kraus N, Wong PC. Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:1325–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuttall HE, Heinrich A, Moore DR, de Boer J. Do cochlear mechanisms explain the noise disruption of the auditory brainstem response to speech? J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133: 3428.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett TA. Information flow in the auditory cortical network. Hear Res. 2011;271:133–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore DR. Listening difficulties in children: bottom-up and top-down contributions. J Commun Dis. 2012;45: 411–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Bendor D. Pitch. In:Rees A, Palmer AR, editors. The Auditory Brain. The Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 149–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschecker JP, Scott SK. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: non-human primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:718–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SK. The neurobiology of speech perception and production: can functional imaging tell us anything we did not already know?J Commun Dis. 2012;45:419–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, David SV, Radtke-Schuller S, Yin P, Shamma SA.Adaptive, behaviorally gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1011–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ress D, Backus BT, Heeger DJ. Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:940–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs F, Mangun GR, Usrey WM. Attention enhances synaptic efficacy and the signal-to-noise ratio in neural circuits. Nature. 2013. Epub 26 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mesgarani N, Chang EF. Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception. Nature. 2012;485:233–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion Golumbic EM, Ding N, Bickel S, Lakatos P, Schevon CA, McKhann GM, et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a ‘cocktail party’. Neuron. 2013;77:980–91. PubMed PMID: 23473326. Epub 2013/03/12. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan E, Censor N, Buch ER, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:838–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller MK, Gatehouse S, Stephens D, Arlinger S, Chisolm T, et al. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(Suppl 2):S92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Science (New York, NY). 1992;255:556–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga A, Egner T. Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2013;20: 228–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan RJ. Neuroimaging of cognition: past, present, and future. Neuron. 2008;60:496–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton B, Venezia JH, Saberi K, Hickok G, Brewer AA. Orthogonal acoustic dimensions define auditory field maps in human cortex. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 20738–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salimpoor VN, van den Bosch I, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ. Interactions between the nucleus accumbens and auditory cortices predict music reward value. Science (New York, NY). 2013;340:216–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK, Plante E. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability. Ear Hear. 2011;32: 156–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James W. The Principles of Psychology (2 vols.). New York: Henry Holt; 1890.
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J, Maire F, Feldman AS, Rubin H. On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 1958;30:254–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Int Med. 2013;173:293–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschark M, Hauser PC. Deaf Cognition: foundations and outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Peelle JE, Johnsrude IS, Davis MH. Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Frontiers Hum Neurosci. 2010;4:51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan V, Messaoud-Galusi S, Rosen S, Nouwens S, Shakespeare B. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:1510–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar