A focus Group Study of Medical Students’ Views of an Integrated Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Curriculum: Students Teaching Teachers

References

• Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998; 280: 1569-75.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton JC, Sparber A.Surveys ofcomplementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med. 2001; 7: 195–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine:results of a national study. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1548–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Kabongo ML. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by primary care patients. A SURF*NET study. J Fam Prac 2000,49: 1121–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafferty AP, McGee BIB, Miller CE, Reyes M. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use: State-specific estimates from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Pub Health 2002, 92: 1598–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel M, Ben-Ayre E. The growing need to teach about complementary and alternative medicine: questions and challenges. Acad Med 2001, 76: 251–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brokaw JJ, Tunnicliff G, Raess BU, Saxon DW. The teaching of complementary and alternative medicine in U.S. medical schools: a survey of course directors. Acad Med 2002, 77: 876–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel MS, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ. Courses involving complementary and alternative medicine at U.S. medical schools. JAMA 1998, 280: 784–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch-Eaton D, Crombie H. Complementary and alternative medicine in the undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach 2002, 24: 100–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaterji R, Tractenberg RE, Amri H, et al. A large-sample survey of first- and second-year medical student attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine in the curriculum and in practice. Ahern Ther Health Med 2007, 13: 30–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie D, Boker J. Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students. BMC Med Educ 2004, 4:2.11
   Google Scholar
• Academic Medicine, October 2007, Volume 82, number 10, p.919–967.
   Google Scholar
• Web site of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine of the National Institutes of Health, USA, www.nccam.nih.gov accessed 11.8.07
   Google Scholar
• Sierpina VS, Schneeweiss R, Frenkel MA, Bulik R, Maypole J. Barriers, Strategies, and Lessons Learned from Complementary and Alternative Medicine Curricular Initiatives. CAM Education. Academic Medicine. 82 (10): 946–950, October 2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratton TD, Benn RK, Lie DA, Zeller JM, Nedrow AR. Evaluating CAM Education in Health Professions Programs. CAM Education. Academic Medicine. 82 (10): 956–961, October 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JJ. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Med Educ 2006, 40: 607–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural medical education: conceptual approaches and frameworks for evaluation. Acad Med 2003, 78: 560–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervalon M. Components of culture in health for medical students’ education. Acad Med 2003, 78: 570–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culhane-Pera KA, Reif C, Egli E, Baker NJ, Kassekert R. A curriculum for multicultural education in family medicine. Fam Med 1997, 29: 719–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert MJ (ed.). Principles and Recommended Standards for Cultural Competence Education of Health Care Professionals. [http://www.calendow.org/reference/publications/pdf/cultural/TCE0215-2003_Principles_and.pdf] The California Endowment, Woodland Hills, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Symm B, Edwards JC. Teaching medical students complementary and alternative medicine using evidence-based principles. J Altern Complement Med 2003, 9: 429–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi O, Bell IR, Rychener D, Gaudet TW, Weil AT. The Tower of Babel: communication and medicine: An essay on medical education and complementary-alternative medicine. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160: 3193–3195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chez RA, Jonas WB, Crawford C. A survey of medical students’ opinions about complementary and alternative medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 185: 754–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper I, Cohen M. Complementary therapies and the medical profession: a study of medical students’ attitudes. Altern Ther Health Med 1998, 4: 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitzer MJ, Mitten D, Harris I, Shandeling J. Attitudes toward CAM among medical, nursing, and pharmacy faculty and students: a comparative analysis. Altern Ther Health Med 2002, 8: 44-47, 50–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lie D and Boker J. Comparative survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) attitudes and use and resource-seeking behavior amongst medical students, residents & faculty. BMC Medical Education. 2006, 6:58.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman T. ‘Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs 2006, 56: 491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus group interviews: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 1994, 16: 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;1990.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter P. Pinfold P, Flintoft V. Gort, E, Thiel E et al. Technical report: Focus groups in health services research at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Pub 99 —02 — TR. 1999, 1-45.
   Google Scholar
• Morcke AM, Wichmann-Hansen G, Nielson DG, Eika B. Complex perspectives on learning objectives: stakeholders’ beliefs about core objectives based on focus group interviews. Med Educ 2006,40: 675–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005, 39: 742–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes DL, DuMont K. Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. In Ecological Research to Promote Social Change: Methodological Advances from Community Psychology. Edited by Revenson TA, D’Augelli AR, French SE et al. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002: 257-89.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks LK, Lin Y, Robertson DW, Robinson DL, Woodrow SI. Understanding the clinical dilemmas that shape medical students’ ethical development: questionnaire survey and focus group study. BMJ 2000, 322: 700–1.
   Google Scholar
• Astin JA, Goddard TG, Forys K. Barriers to the integration of mind-body medicine: perceptions of physicians, residents, and medical students. Explore (NY). 2005, 1: 278–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fadiman, A. The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro J, Lie D, Gutierrez D, Zhuang G. “That would never have occurred to me”: a qualitative study of medical students’ view of a cultural competence curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2006, 6:31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro J, Hollingshead J, Morrison EH. Primary care resident, faculty, and patient views of barriers to cultural competence, and the skills needed to overcome them. Med Educ 2002, 36: 749–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro J, Morrison EH, Hollingshead J. Self-perceived attitudes and skills of cultural competence: a comparison of family medicine and internal medicine residents. Med Teach 2003, 25: 327–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JB. The use of focus groups in clinical research. In Doing qualitative research 2nd edition. Edited by Crabtree BF, Miller WI. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data. Edited by Bryman A, Burgess RG. London: Routledge 1994, 173-94.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire 2007 UC Irvine data.
   Google Scholar