About this journal
Aims and scope
Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives is a refereed journal publishing papers which seeks to address one or more of the following themes:
- The different kinds of reflective practice and the purposes they serve
- Reflection and the generation of knowledge in particular professions
- The ways reflection is taught and learned most meaningfully
- The links between reflective learning and the quality of workplace action
Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives publishes original, challenging and stimulating work which explores reflection within and on practice, as a collective activity, that concerns personal knowing and transformation, collective regeneration and political activism, reflection and voice, values, negotiated meaning, identity and community.
Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives includes papers that address the connections between reflection, knowledge generation, practice and policy. The journal also publishes shorter pieces on recent initiatives, reports of work in progress, proposals for collaborative research, theoretical positions, knowledge reported in poetic, diagrammatic and narrative form illuminated by line drawings and photography, provocative problem and question-posing thought pieces, reflective dialogues and creative reflective conversations. Reflective Practice also incorporates, from time to time, Special Issues on 'hot' topics.
Peer Review Policy:
All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on a three-fold process of initial editor screening, double anonymized review by two of the journal’ referees and a final judgement by the editor.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 282K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 1.6 (2023) Impact Factor
- Q2 Impact Factor Best Quartile
- 1.9 (2023) 5 year IF
- 2.9 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.191 (2023) SNIP
- 0.497 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 27 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 112 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 11 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 27% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Editor:
Prof (Dr) Arthur Langer - Columbia University, USA
Editor Emeritus:
Professor Tony Ghaye - Director, Reflective Learning International
Associate Editor:
Erin Augis - Ramapo College, New Jersey, USA
Editorial Board:
Tejwansh S. Anand - University of Maryland, USA
Dennis Beach - University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Simon Brooman - Liverpool John Moores University, UK
Peter Cappelli - University of Pennsylvania, USA
Phil Chambers - Senior Consultant in Creative Arts (RL-UK)
Eva Chan - University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Feng-ming Chi - National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan
Jean Clandinin - University of Alberta, Canada
Simon Collin - Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada
Cheryl Craig – Texas A&M University, USA
Andrea Daley - York University, Canada
Yordanka Dimova - Plovdiv University, Bulgaria
Martin Dixon - San Francisco State University, USA
Ann Donohoe - University College Dublin, Ireland
Sharon Dotger - Syracuse University, USA
Margaretha Ekebergh - University of Borås, Sweden
Zara Ersozlu - Deakin University, Australia
Pierre Faller - Teachers College, Columbia University, USA
Thomas S.C. Farrell - Brock University, Canada
Abbey Hyde - University College Dublin, Ireland
Liz Jones - Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Tammy Kwan - The University of Hong Kong, China
Sarah Lee - UWE Hartpury College, UK
Yi Li - University of Manitoba, Canada
Laura B. Liu - Indiana University-Purdue University, USA
Sue Lillyman - University of Worcester, UK
John Loughran - Monash University, Australia
Crystal Machado - Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA
Alan Mandell - SUNY Empire State College, USA
Stefanos Mantzoukas - Highest Technological Educational Institution of Epirus, Greece
Galina Markova - New Bulgarian University, Bulgaria
Victoria Marsick - Columbia University, USA
Oliver McGarr - University of Limerick, Ireland
Anita Melander Wikman - Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
Jenny Weller-Newton - University of Canberra, Australia
Vikki Pollard - Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Sarah J. Ramsey - Southwestern Oklahoma State University, USA
Chuck Snow - Pennsylvania State University, USA
Katarina Stenberg - University of Helsinki, Finland
Dannelle Stevens - Portland State University, USA
Hilde Stroobants - UC-Leuven-Limburg, Belgium
Charlene Tan - Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Mai Thi Thanh Thai - HEC, Montreal, Canada
David Thomas - Georgetown University, USA
Hiwa Weisi - Razi University, Iran
Updated 3 February 2023
Abstracting and indexing
Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives is abstracted in Australian Education Index (AEI); Emerging Sources Citation Index ( ESCI); National Database for Research into International Education (NDRI); the British Education Index; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCOhost EJS; Educational Research Abstracts online (ERA); PsychINFO and SCOPUS®
Open access
Reflective Practice is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
6 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Reflective Practice?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Reflective Practice.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors