318
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 104-121 | Received 23 Apr 2017, Accepted 20 Sep 2017, Published online: 03 Apr 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Using Politeness Theory as the theoretical lens, we explore how Hillary Rodham Clinton overcame a tough primary race against Bernie Sanders while Donald J. Trump emerged unexpectedly from a large field of experienced and highly qualified candidates to win the Republican nomination for president. We examine the degree of aggression and support of candidates’ image in the messages exchanged in the primary debates along the lines of disagreement over character, policy, use of data, and campaign tactics. The results suggest that Republican candidates in their primary debates relied more on aggressive discourse strategies to appeal to partisan voters than Democrats; Democratic candidates were more supportive of one another while debating their differences than Republicans in the primary debates. The trend across two presidential election cycles suggests that primary debates are featuring more aggression, at least for Republicans, and it also appears that voters may be responding favorably to the strategy, at least in the most recent presidential campaign.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Shelly S. Hinck

Shelly Schaefer Hinck is Professor in the Department of Communication and Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University.

Edward A. Hinck

Edward Hinck is Professor in the Department of Communication and Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University.

William O. Dailey

William Dailey is Professor in the Department of Communication and Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University.

Robert S. Hinck

Robert S. Hinck is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Monmouth College.

Elizabeth Hansen

Elizabeth Hansen is a recent graduate of Central Michigan University.

Bradley Madsen

Bradley Madsen is a current undergraduate at Central Michigan University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.