537
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Potential phosphorus losses in overland flow from pastoral soils receiving long‐term applications of either superphosphate or reactive phosphate rock

, &
Pages 329-337 | Received 21 Jan 2003, Accepted 13 Jun 2003, Published online: 17 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

The forms and concentrations of P in overland flow were measured from intact pastoral soils obtained from the Winchmore long‐term P fertiliser trial. Treatments under evaluation were soils that received either 0, 188, 250 or 376 kg superphosphate ha−1 yr−1, or 175 kg reactive phosphate rock (RPR) ha−1 yr−1. The objective was to determine the magnitude of potential P transfers from soil to water following P fertilisation, and to determine if losses were different following RPR fertilisation compared with superphosphate. Overland flow was induced by the application of artificial rainfall at 15 mm h−1, maintained for 1 h after flow commenced. Concentrations of dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) mirrored the long‐term application rates, although prior to a fresh application of P, soils with P applied in RPR form lost more P during an event than soils with the same rate of P applied as superphosphate. After a fresh application of RPR and superphosphate treatments, up to 5.4 mg TP litre−1 was lost in flow from the 376 kg superphosphate ha−1 yr−1 treatment, while P in flow from soils fertilised with RPR were commonly c. 0.11 mg litre−1, but still greater than from the unfertilised control soils (0.02 mg litre−1). Regression analysis indicated that DRP concentrations in flow from the fertilised soils were elevated above that lost before fertiliser application for a period of approximately 60 days. These results support earlier studies that demonstrate the greater risks of incidental P losses from soluble P fertilisers such as superphosphate (up to 60 days), and conversely the potential environmental benefits from RPR fertilisation of soils “at‐risk” of P loss (e.g., where much overland flow occurs such as in very wet soils and near stream channels). However, if good management practice is followed then the difference in P loss between superphosphate and RPR treated soils should be minimal over a period of a year.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.