This article describes Pure Talk, a type of witty conversation practiced in China from 200–600 C.E. Pure Talk differs from other uses of wit by oppositional, marginalized groups because its practitioners came from the elite and were not inherently stigmatized. Pure Talk is compared to two contemporary uses of wit by oppositional marginalized groups, African‐Americans and gay men. This comparison is used to support some hypotheses about the advantages and drawbacks of the game of wit and to raise some questions about the values assumed by this communicative strategy, its effects on its practitioners, and the degree to which such wit is truly oppositional.
Wit, power, and oppositional groups: A case study of “pure talk”
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.