1,533
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Defining animal welfare — does consistency matter?

Pages 71-73 | Received 18 Sep 2008, Accepted 23 Feb 2009, Published online: 16 Feb 2011
 

Abstract

Animal welfare has many varied understandings reflecting social concerns for, and the scientific assessments of, the way animals are treated. They range from the absence of suffering, to where the animal is in a state of complete mental and physical health and in harmony with its environment, to an economic or socio-political understanding reflecting human preferences. Animal welfare thus has both empirical (scientific) and moral components. It is suggested that the term should be considered as a judgement to be undertaken by combining varied understandings. Furthermore, it may be more important to acknowledge underlying values and assumptions, both moral and scientific, than to risk excluding valid viewpoints through pursuing a prescriptive definition.

Acknowledgements

The Animal Welfare Group (MAF Biosecurity, New Zealand) and the NAWAC, and especially Cheryl O'Connor and Peter O'Hara, are thanked for commissioning this piece of work and providing their invaluable insights. Sarah Fisher is thanked for assistance with the manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.