511
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methods in Addiction Research

Timeline: A web application for assessing the timing and details of health behaviors

, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 141-150 | Received 01 Feb 2018, Accepted 20 Apr 2018, Published online: 14 May 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview methods are used to assess a variety of health behaviors, including alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior. While several online TLFBs have been developed, most focus on single behaviors, and few studies have explored their validity in assessing multiple risk behaviors using a single online TLFB. Objective: To examine the validity of a customizable web application (Timeline) for assessing alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior among high-risk men who have sex with men. Methods: Participants (N = 15 men) completed standardized survey instruments before undergoing a 30-day daily diary procedure where they submitted daily reports of health risk behaviors via smartphone. They then completed a Timeline at the end of the 30-day period covering the same time interval. Results: Comparing a baseline administration of Timeline with popular surveys of health risk behaviors supported Timeline’s validity (r = 0.41–0.59 for alcohol use, r = 0.83 for drug use, and r = 0.34–0.52) for sexual behaviors. While participants reported similar amounts of each behavior via daily diary as they did on a follow-up Timeline (r = 0.55–0.88 for alcohol use, r = 0.69 for drug use, and r = 0.87–0.92 for sexual behaviors), results provided evidence of underreporting on the Timeline. Timing of behaviors also frequently disagreed across these methods. Conclusions: Timeline is valid for assessing overall engagement in alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior over a 30-day window. However, researchers interested in the specific timing of behaviors within assessment intervals should use smaller follow-up intervals (e.g., 7 days, 14 days) or more intensive reporting methods (e.g., daily diary).

Disclosure of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health [R21MH109374]; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K08AA024056, L30AA023336, P01AA019072, R34AA023478].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.