Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 38, 2019 - Issue 4
332
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Endovascular treatment of carotid–cavernous sinus fistulas: ophthalmic and visual outcomes

, , , , &
Pages 290-299 | Received 05 Aug 2018, Accepted 30 Oct 2018, Published online: 22 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The main objective was to report the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, angiography features, treatment modality and post-treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with carotid cavernous fistulas (CCF).

Methods: A retrospective review of the medical imaging database in conjunction with medical records from 2004 to 2017 at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH) was conducted.We identified 39 patients with CCF (16 direct, 23 indirect). A total of 37 diagnoses were confirmed by direct catheter angiography. The remaining two cases were diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography.

Results: Coils were deployed in 100% of direct and 83% of treated indirect fistulas that were treated. Other embolic agents were deployed alone or in combination with coils. Successful angiographic closure was achieved in 93% of direct and 92% of indirect fistulas. Multiple treatments were required in 33% of direct and 16% of indirect fistulas. Visual acuity improved in patients with direct fistulae(p = 0.02) and was preserved in those with indirect fistulae. Post-treatment diplopia persisted in six patients with direct fistulas and three patients with indirect fistulas. Four patients with indirect fistulas experienced persistent ocular hypertension post-treatment compared to two patients with direct fistulas.

Conclusions: Endovascular coils are the most commonly deployed treatment for CCF. Both indirect and direct fistulas achieved high rates of closure; however, indirect fistulas were less likely to require multiple treatments. Good post-procedural vision was achieved for both groups.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.