1,117
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The role of conflicting online reviews in consumers’ attitude ambivalence

冲突的在线评论在消费者态度矛盾中的作用

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1003-1030 | Received 22 Jul 2019, Accepted 21 Oct 2019, Published online: 04 Nov 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The extant literature overlooks conflicting online hotel reviews from the perspective of online and offline factors and their effect on attitude ambivalence, which determines consumer behavior. The present study fills this research gap using the heuristic–systematic model of information processing and examines: (1) how conflicting customer star ratings (i.e. heuristic cues) and opinions about hotel attributes (i.e. systematic cues) engender attitude ambivalence, (2) how offline interpersonal informational influence moderates the relationship between conflicting reviews and attitude ambivalence, and (3) relational impact on purchase intentions. The data collected from 382 inbound tourists in Beijing, China reveal the positive effect of conflicting star ratings and opinions about hotel attributes on attitude ambivalence, which lowers consumers’ purchase intentions. This study also finds a significant role of offline interpersonal informational influence as a moderator. Theoretical implications are provided, and findings have strategic managerial implications with the acknowledgement of limitations and directions for future scholars.

摘要

过去的研究忽视了从线上和线下的因素角度考虑对态度矛盾性的影响,以及如何决定消费者的行为。本研究从信息处理的启发式系统模型填补了这一领域的空白,并检验了(1)相互冲突的顾客星级(即启发式线索)和对酒店属性的看法(即系统性线索)如何引起态度矛盾,(2) 线下的人际信息影响力如何调节冲突的评论和态度矛盾之间的关系,以及检验了对购买意愿的关系影响。从中国北京382名入境游客中收集的数据显示,星级酒店评价和酒店相关属性的观点不一致对态度矛盾产生正向影响,从而降低了消费者的购买意愿。这项研究还发现线下的人际信息影响起到调节变量的重要作用。本文提供了一定的理论启示,并且该研究结果对于论文的局限性和未来方向也具有战略管理意义。

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief Professor Levent Altinay and two anonymous reviewers for their honest, helpful, and constructive comments. This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China awarded to Jin Sun (Grant No. 71772040) and also supported by the Program for Excellent Talents in UIBE (Grant No. 17JQ03).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors .

Notes

1 The present study uses the terms ‘mixed,’ ‘contradictory,’ and ‘conflicting’ interchangeably.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 71772040]; Program for Excellent Talents in UIBE [grant number 17JQ03].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.