2,594
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Effect of Sampling Time on the Overall Performance of Portable Microbial Impactors

&
Pages 75-82 | Received 30 Jan 2009, Accepted 24 Sep 2009, Published online: 13 Jul 2010
 

Abstract

In this study we analyzed the sampling time effect on the overall performance of seven portable impactors (SMA MicroPortable, BioCulture, Microflow, MAS-100, Millipore Air Tester, SAS Super 180, and RCS High Flow) as well as a stationary impactor (BioStage) when collecting airborne bacteria and fungi from 2 to 30 minutes indoors and outdoors. Their performance was compared against the reference BioStage impactor collecting samples for 2 minutes. When bacteria were collected outdoors, the average concentration ratio of all test samplers relative to the reference sampler was 0.64, but it decreased to 0.04 when bacteria were collected for 2 min first and subsequently exposed to particle-free air for 28 min (30 min total sampling time). For fungi, the average concentration ratio decreased from 0.35 to 0.03 under the same conditions. When the test impactors sampled particle-free air first and then collected bioaerosols outdoors for 2 min, the concentration ratio for bacteria averaged for all test samplers decreased from 0.77 (agar plates not exposed to particle-free air and particles collected for 2 min) to 0.04 (agar plates exposed to particle-free air for 28 min first and then particles collected for 2 min). For fungi, the relative recovery averaged for all samplers decreased from 0.45 to 0.03 under the same conditions. The effects of sampling time and impactor model were statistically significant for all experimental conditions. Thus, the data obtained in this study suggest that when impactors are used for the collection of airborne bacteria and fungi, sampling times should be as short as reasonably possible to minimize the under-representation of airborne microorganism concentration which could be a factor of 10 or higher for prolonged sampling times.

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the CDC/NIOSH grant DHHS-CDC1-K01-OH008029. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the sponsors. The technical assistance by EMD Chemicals, Inc. (Gibbstown, NJ), A.P. BUCK Inc. (Orlando, FL), Veltek Associates, Inc. (Phoenixville, PA), Bioscience International, Inc., (Rockville, MD), Millipore Corp., (Billerica, MA), and Biotest Diagnostics Corp., (Denville, NJ) is appreciated.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.