3,458
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effect of venting range hood flow rate on size-resolved ultrafine particle concentrations from gas stove cooking

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1370-1381 | Received 24 Apr 2018, Accepted 24 Aug 2018, Published online: 05 Nov 2018
 

Abstract

Cooking is the main source of ultrafine particles (UFP) in homes. This study investigated the effect of venting range hood flow rate on size-resolved UFP concentrations from gas stove cooking. The same cooking protocol was conducted 60 times using three venting range hoods operated at six flow rates in twin research houses. Size-resolved particle (10–420 nm) concentrations were monitored using a NanoScan scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) from 15 min before cooking to 3 h after the cooking had stopped. Cooking increased the background total UFP number concentrations to 1.3 × 103 particles/cm3 on average, with a mean exposure-relevant source strength of 1.8 × 1012 particles/min. Total particle peak reductions ranged from 25% at the lowest fan flow rate of 36 L/s to 98% at the highest rate of 146 L/s. During the operation of a venting range hood, particle removal by deposition was less significant compared to the increasing air exchange rate driven by exhaust ventilation. Exposure to total particles due to cooking varied from 0.9 to 5.8 × 104 particles/cm3·h, 3 h after cooking ended. Compared to the 36 L/s range hood, higher flow rates of 120 and 146 L/s reduced the first-hour post-cooking exposure by 76% and 85%, respectively.

© 2018 Crown Copyright. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Editor:

This article is part of the following collections:
Indoor Environments and Aerosols

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jennifer Logue for her great help in planning the study protocol. We thank Health Canada staff (Ronald Garson, Patrick Goegan, and Francis Lavoie) for their help in carrying out the cooking experiments. Finally, we thank Gary Mallach and Eric Lavigne for conducting the Health Canada internal review of this manuscript.