http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-3440
![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Amidst the rapidly evolving Higher Education (HE) landscape, this paper provides a systematic review of Academic Development (AD) work, the roles and responsibilities of Academic Developers (ADs) in HE. Beginning from the perspective that HE institutions, as publicly funded organisations, have responsibility to contribute to the public good, more than 100 peer-reviewed papers (1995–2015) are interrogated under five themes. These are: a review of reviews, technology and AD work, their status and identity, assessment of AD work and impact, and the leadership roles of ADs and their impact on institutional leadership. Critical to the evolution of their work has been a more mainstream and public contribution. Their emerging responsibilities in collaboration with institutional leaders, as ‘brokers’ and ‘bridge-builders’ position them more strategically within institutions – with potential to be compromised in terms of their espoused values and dispositions while potentially more influential in shaping the futures of their organisations.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest.
Notes
1. To read more about this project, that involves academic developers and researchers from six public comprehensive universities in Norway, Sweden, Ireland and the USA. see: http://www.uv.uio.no/iped/english/research/projects/solbrekke-formation-and-competence-building/).
2. The International Consortium for Academic Development and Society for Research in Higher Education (SRHE) serve as good examples of the growth in international networks/CoP, while levels of participation at such international conferences suggest that the work of ADs is no longer a ‘shadow’ economy, but highly visible and increasingly mainstream.
