254
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake

Pages 35-74 | Published online: 17 Sep 2010
 

Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) are pre-coded forms consisting of selected foods that are usually grouped based on their nutrient constitution. By carefully selecting food items that are most important to the basic diet and by grouping them, a relatively short questionnaire can be developed to estimate nutritional exposure accurately, at a relatively low cost. Two major FFQs, the Harvard University/Willett's Questionnaire and the National Cancer Institute/Block's Questionnaire as well as their modified versions have been used in different studies. In general the contents of two FFQs are similar. However, nuances in structure and cognitive aspects set them apart. The objectives of this paper are three fold. First, to provide a historical review of the process of design and development of each FFQ. Second, to compare their cognitive and structural similarities and differences, and finally, to discuss their limitations and biases associated with estimating food intake.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.