The opportunity for and intensity of sexual selection in a seed bug depend on host plant dispersion

Abstract

In fields of the coastal plain of Georgia (USA), the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis, feeds and mates exclusively on ragwort. The distribution of ragwort, Senecio tomentosus, is either dispersed, with small numbers of plants spread over large areas, or clustered, with large numbers of plants concentrated into relatively small areas. In dispersed habitat, the density of seed bugs is always low (< 20/0.25 m²) as is the proportion of adults who are mating (20%). In clustered habitat, adult densities are occasionally high (30–75/0.25 m²) as are mating rates (> 67%). In both habitats, mating males are in better condition (= mass – mass expected from length) than non-mating males. In clustered habitats, aggression between males occurs frequently and determines residency in areas of high ragwort abundance to which females are especially attracted for mating and oviposition. A mark-recapture study revealed that males move about more in dispersed than clustered habitats, possibly searching for mates. Variance in male mating efficiency (copulations/sightings) matches random expectations in dispersed habitats but is significantly higher than that in clustered habitats, suggesting greater opportunity for sexual selection. A multivariate analysis of selection intensity using mark-recapture data revealed that longer wings and shorter bodies are favored in dispersed habitat, suggesting selection on ability to search for mates. In clustered habitat, selection favors a longer body, antennae, and legs. This finding suggests selection favoring dominance in aggressive interactions, as legs and antennae are used to grapple with opponents and to seize females during aggressive courtship.

KEY WORDS:

• aggressive courtship
• intensity of selection
• mark-recapture
• seed bug
• ragwort

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Georgia Southern University students of Behavioral Ecology, and especially Keton V. Patel, for their assistance with much of the field work of this study in Spring and Summer terms of 2015–2017.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ETHICAL STANDARD

The study was done in full compliance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee to ensure ethical treatment of study animals.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

Both authors contributed to the study conception, experimental design, analysis of results, and manuscript preparation.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

All data analyzed in and supporting conclusions of this manuscript are accessible at https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/data/8/ (https://doi.org/10.20429/data.2021.01).

Additional information

Funding

The authors have no funding to report.