3,676
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Minority talks: The influence of descriptive social norms on fruit intake

, , &
Pages 956-970 | Received 13 May 2011, Accepted 20 Oct 2011, Published online: 12 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

Previous research established that norms describing the behaviour of a majority (e.g. ‘many people consume too much alcohol’) can have ironic and unwanted effects on health behaviour. To date, no research has addressed the effects of minority descriptive norms (e.g. ‘only few people use sunscreen’), while such minority norms are frequently communicated to the public. The current studies investigate the effects of minority and majority norms on intended and actual fruit intake. University students received either minority or majority normative information describing fruit intake behaviour of a referent group. Identification strength with this referent group was measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Study 2). Results showed that, compared to majority norms, minority norms negatively affected fruit intake when participants strongly identify with the referent group. Moreover, absolute negative (minority norm) and positive (majority norm) effects of one-third portion of fruit were found compared to a no-norm condition. Since minority norms are often communicated with the intention of alarming people regarding their low engagement in health protective behaviour, the potential ironic effects of these minority norms should be taken into account when presenting such information to the public.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the European Community FP7 Research Program (Health-F2-2008-223488). The authors acknowledge all members of the TEMPEST consortium.

Notes

1. A second MANOVA was conducted with the same dependent variables, but additionally including credibility of the provided norm. Condition was again the independent variable, but the control condition was excluded from this randomisation check as no normative information was provided in that condition. Results again indicated successful randomisation, with none of the effects reaching significance, all F's(3, 81) <2.10, all p's > 0.110.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.