Intended and Unanticipated Consequences and Potential of Urban Homesteading

Abstract

An attempt is made to evaluate urban homesteading in a holistic, neighborhood context, one incorporating multiple perspectives of groups associated with it. Most prior analyses of urban homesteading tend to consider only public sector program intentions and attitudes. By integrating into an evaluation the aims and commitments of the private and “popular” sectors, a more thorough and hopefully accurate picture of a program’s scope, impact and consequences (unanticipated as well as those which were planned) can be painted. Using the Minneapolis homestead program as a case study, it was found that some intended socio-economic consequences which homesteading provided, such as increased tax revenues and stimulating ge gentrification, proved beneficial for the city government but were less than desirable for many residents in homestead neighborhoods. Other economic, social and psychological dimensions are also considered from perspectives of groups involved. The suggestion is made that urban homesteading, as well as other housing programs, needs to be assessed more comprehensively, with attention given to the range of views of pertinent actors, so that policymakers and the public have access to more accurate and complete information about them.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Barbara O. Nieri

Barbara O. Nieri is in the Energy, Conservation and Management Branch, Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Abraham K. Farkas

Abraham K. Farkas is Director of Community Development & Planning, City of Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana.