Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 15, 2008 - Issue 2
451
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Brain–Computer Interface Devices: Risks and Canadian Regulations

Pages 63-86 | Published online: 14 Apr 2008
 

Abstract

Implantable Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) devices are currently in clinical trials in the U.S., and their introduction into the Canada could follow in the next few years. This article provides an overview of the research, developments, design issues, and risks in BCIs and an analysis of the adequacy of the regulatory framework in place for the approval of medical devices in Canada, emphasizing device investigational testing. The article concludes that until better safeguards are in place, to best protect potential research subjects, BCIs should not be approved for investigational testing in Canada.

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Françoise Baylis, Andrew Fenton, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Notes

1Other recent research on DBS aims to produce insulated nanoscale wire electrodes that would be threaded to the brain through the body's capillaries, after being inserted through an artery in the arm or groin (CitationLlinas et al., 2005).

2Because BCIs are comprised of several components, only one of which is implanted in the brain, the discussion below refers to “devices” and/or “systems.” Both words are intended to convey all the components of the BCI.

3A neurotrophic electrode is a “tiny device implanted onto a target area on the outer layer for the brain to detect neural activity there” (Neural Signals, 2006).

4Note that this section partly summarizes a prior article by the author (CitationAlpert, 2007).

5For a more in-depth discussion of both the pre-and post-market activities and the A.G.'s report, see (CitationAlpert, 2007).

6Note that “good clinical practices” are required to be followed for medical device testing in the U.S.

Food and Drugs Act. 1985 R.S.C. 1985, c. F-27. Canada.

Caplan A. 2007 Personal communication. January 12, 2007. (S. Alpert)

MDR 1998 Medical Device Regulations. SOR/98–282. Canada.

Ross C. 2001 Paralyzed football star vows to fight on. Quincy, MA: The Patriot Ledger.

TPD 1999 Preparation of an application for investigational testing—Medical devices (Guidance document). Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada.

TPD 2007 Discussion paper for consultation: Investigational testing of medical devices (Guidance document). Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada. Ottawa. July 25.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.