No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts

ABSTRACT

We conducted this scoping review of common errors identified by editors and reviewers of biomedical manuscripts. Errors includes items that a reviewer or editor might identify as needing correction. The errors were categorized by section of the manuscript: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References. After screening 87 published studies, 16 papers were selected for data extraction. Of these 16 studies, the most frequently represented disciplines were Medicine (n = 5), Radiology (n = 2), and Psychiatry (n = 2). The most reported common errors included inappropriate study design, inadequate sample size, poor statistical analysis, and unclear and inadequate description of methods. Abstracts not reflecting the content of the paper were the most frequent general common error in biomedical manuscripts. The findings of this study offer one perspective on common errors in biomedical manuscripts and might be a useful guide for novice authors.

KEYWORDS:

• Peer review
• common errors
• biomedical manuscripts
• scoping review

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.