Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 7, 1999 - Issue 1
107
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Encouraging accountability in research: A pilot assessment of training effortsFootnote1

&
Pages 85-100 | Published online: 11 Jun 2008
 

Purpose. This pilot assessment describes institutional approaches to satisfying the NIH training requirement in the responsible conduct of research. Descriptive information from this review will be valuable for institutions and researchers who are developing or improving training programs. Methods. The authors reviewed materials submitted by a sample of grantee institutions in response to a request by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional and programmatic characteristics were summarized and described. Results. Institutions in the sample employed a diversity of approaches to satisfying the training grant requirement. Approaches varied both among and within institutions. Further, the number of training grants held at the institution had some impact on how the training grant requirement was met. Conclusion. This assessment is a valuable first step in describing institutional responses to the NIH training grant requirement. It indicates the need for further research on institutional approaches to education and training in the responsible conduct of research, including research on characteristics of training programs, effectiveness of training initiatives, and on how to broaden current training efforts to ensure that all scientists in training are prepared to address ethical dilemmas in their professional careers, regardless of the source of funding for their training.

Notes

Some policy implications of the results presented here are discussed in Mastroianni, A.C. and Kahn, J.P. (1998) The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 73(12):1249–1254. Thanks to William Raub and Lily Engstrom at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for providing access to the sample of materials, and to Wayne Hartley of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Minnesota for his assistance in statistical compilation.

Corresponding author: 608 Condon Hall, Box 354 600, 1100 NE Campus Parkway Seattle, WA 98105–6617. Tel.: 206–616–3482. Fax: 206–616–3480. E‐mail: [email protected].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.