Publication Cover
AIDS Care
Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
Volume 27, 2015 - Issue 10
250
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of age and physical health on processing speed in HIV

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1326-1331 | Received 06 Jan 2015, Accepted 19 May 2015, Published online: 15 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

The impact of age and physical health on processing speed was investigated in 42 non-demented HIV+ individuals ranging in age from 30 to 75. We used the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Healthy Survey (MOS-HIV) to measure self-reported physical health, neuropsychological tests to measure psychomotor and cognitive processing speed (Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, letter and category fluency), and a test of the foreperiod effect to measure reaction time under increasing attentional load. Results indicated that aging and worse physical health each independently contributed to slowing on different processing speed measures, while the interaction between aging and physical health did not contribute to processing speed. These findings highlight the importance of considering physical health separately from age when measuring cognitive function in HIV+ adults.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplementary 1 (content) is available via the “Supplementary” tab on the article's online page (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1054340).

Notes

1. All analyses were performed with and without these two participants. Analyses of the SRT were unchanged. Regression results that did change include increased p values on contribution of age to ISI-Short2, ISI-Long, and Grooved Pegboard (from p ≤ 0.01 to p ≤ 0.05). Both participants’ data were included in the analyses reported here.

2. The total of all error trials, including anticipatory trials, erroneous click responses, missed responses, and outliers, was examined: 11 participants had <1% error trials, 23 participants had 1–5% error trials, and 8 participants had >5% error trials. There was no age group difference on the number of error trials (age group (χ² = .00, p = 1.0) Also, all subsequent analyses were performed with and without the eight participants and results were unchanged.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Alzheimer's Association [grant number IIRG-05-13534]; a Professional Staff Congress-City University of New York [grant number 61056-00-39] awarded to N. S. F.; and a City University of New York Graduate Center Doctoral Student Council Grant 2010 awarded to K. V. D.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.