Publication Cover
Early Years
An International Research Journal
Volume 40, 2020 - Issue 2
2,393
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Insider perspectives: the ‘tricky business’ of providing for children’s sleep and rest needs in the context of early childhood education and care

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 221-236 | Received 08 Aug 2017, Accepted 18 Feb 2018, Published online: 07 Mar 2018
 

Abstract

Sleep and rest provision in early childhood education and care (ECEC) is commonly enacted as a routine – a standard time-period during which children are required to lie down even if they do not sleep. Yet contemporary ECEC policies emphasise responsive pedagogical practice that includes children in decision-making and respects each child’s developmental and sociocultural context as appropriate pedagogical practice. To understand current practices, analyses of numeric data and textual accounts from a survey of Australian ECEC service providers, leaders and educators (N = 247) was undertaken. Two broad challenges to enabling responsive practice and inclusion of children in decision-making were identified: (1) Provisions – organisational interpretations of national policy and attendant resourcing set the structural parameters for achievement of responsive pedagogical practice. (2) Practices – individual and communal demands on educators and their professional philosophy set interactional parameters. Service leadership played a pivotal role in determining whether sleep–rest practices were Routine (84%) or Responsive (16%). Responsive leaders were characterised by strong professional advocacy for child rights and child-focused pedagogy. They instigated professional reflection and communication strategies within their service and removed expectation that educators could undertake alternative activity while providing for children’s sleep and rest.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training, Australia.

Supplemental data

The supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1443434.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating educators, service leaders and provider organisations for their inputs to this study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.