1,226
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The differential effects of collaborative vs. individual prewriting planning on computer-mediated L2 writing: transferability of task-based linguistic skills in focus

ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

The current study aimed at investigating the effects of three types of prewriting planning conditions, namely teacher-monitored collaborative planning (TMCP), student-led collaborative planning (SLCP), and individual planning (IP) on EFL learners’ computer-mediated L2 written production and learning transfer from a pedagogic task to a new task of similar complexity. To this end, 76 EFL learners were randomly assigned into one of the three groups: TMCP group, SLCP group, and IP group. Two complex letter writing tasks were used in this study to collect the required data: complex task 1 (CT 1) and complex task 2 (CT 2). To perform CT 1, at first, the participants in TMCP and SLCP groups were required to have prewriting collaborative planning via Telegram instant messaging, while the participants in IP group were required to do the prewriting planning individually. To examine learning transfer, one week after they performed CT 1, the participants in the three groups were asked to perform CT 2 for which there was no planning time. The results revealed that (1) the three types of prewriting planning conditions used in the present study promoted different dimensions of the participants’ computer-mediated L2 writing, (2) the participants in different groups differently transferred their linguistic abilities to the new task, and (3) factors such as teachers’ monitoring and directing students’ performance seemed to channel the participants’ attention toward specific dimensions of L2 production and hence influenced the quality of their L2 writing and learning transfer. Implications are discussed, and avenues for future research are outlined.

Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful to the anonymous reviewers of the Computer-Assisted Language Learning Journal for their insightful comments. Without their constructive feedback, the paper would not have achieved this level of clarity. I am equally grateful to the participants in this study for their willingness to spend time with me on this research.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Mohammad Amiryousefi

Mohammad Amiryousefi, PhD, is an assistant professor in TEFL at the Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Iran. His research interests include CALL and TBLT.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.