Intellectual appearances¹

This paper began as a reply to a paper called ‘The “Intellectualisation of Appearances” ‘ by Carol van Kirk. Both Professor van Kirk's paper and my reply were delivered on 26 April 1991 at the Central Division meetings of the American Philosophical Association. I am grateful to Professor van Kirk, as well as to participants in the discussion, for stimulating and helping to clarify my thoughts on the Amphiboly section of the First Critique. I gratefully acknowledge further debts to Karl Ameriks, Michael Friedman, George di Giovanni, Stephen Menn, Miles Rind and Catherine Wilson.

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

This paper began as a reply to a paper called ‘The “Intellectualisation of Appearances” ‘ by Carol van Kirk. Both Professor van Kirk's paper and my reply were delivered on 26 April 1991 at the Central Division meetings of the American Philosophical Association. I am grateful to Professor van Kirk, as well as to participants in the discussion, for stimulating and helping to clarify my thoughts on the Amphiboly section of the First Critique. I gratefully acknowledge further debts to Karl Ameriks, Michael Friedman, George di Giovanni, Stephen Menn, Miles Rind and Catherine Wilson.