- McRae , Robert . 1976 . Leibniz: Perception, Apperception and Thought , 126 – 129 . Toronto : University of Toronto Press .
- Parkinson , G. H. R. 1982 . “ ‘The “Intellectualization of Appearances”: Aspects of Leibniz's Theory of Sensation and Thought’ ” . In Leibniz: Critical and Interpretative Essays , Edited by: Hooker , Michael . 3 – 21 . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
- Wilson , Margaret . 1977 . ‘Confused Ideas’ . Rice University Studies , 63 ( 4 ) : 123 – 137 .
- Gerhardt , C. J. 1960 . Die Philosophische Schriften von G. W. Leibniz , 7 volumes , Hildesheim : Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung .
- Leibniz . 1989 . Philosophical Papers and Letters , Edited by: Loemker , Leroy . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
- McRae . Leibniz 128
- Parkinson . “ ‘The “Intellectualisation” ‘ ” . 15
- Jolley , Nicholas , ed. 1990 . “ ‘The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century’ ” . In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
- Fichte . 1970 . “ ‘Second Introduction to the Science of Knowledge’ ” . In Science of Knowledge (Wissenschaftslehre) with First and Second Introductions , Edited by: Heath , Peter and Lachs , John . 82 New York : Meredith Corporation .
- Pawn's , H. J. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals , 119 – 120 . New York : Harper Torchbooks, New York . translation of the
- Guyer , Paul , ed. 1992 . “ ‘Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science’ ” . In The Cambridge Companion to Kant , 161 – 199 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
- 1973 . The Kant‐Eberhard Controversy , 160 Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press .
- This paper began as a reply to a paper called ‘The “Intellectualisation of Appearances” ‘ by Carol van Kirk. Both Professor van Kirk's paper and my reply were delivered on 26 April 1991 at the Central Division meetings of the American Philosophical Association. I am grateful to Professor van Kirk, as well as to participants in the discussion, for stimulating and helping to clarify my thoughts on the Amphiboly section of the First Critique. I gratefully acknowledge further debts to Karl Ameriks, Michael Friedman, George di Giovanni, Stephen Menn, Miles Rind and Catherine Wilson.
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume 3, 1995 - Issue 2