173
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

The psychometric properties of the cervical nonorganic signs in patients with neck pain: an assessment of pain expression

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 751-756 | Received 27 Jun 2016, Accepted 15 Dec 2016, Published online: 05 Jan 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: Neck pain is a common cause of disability. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the cervical nonorganic signs (CNOS), a tool for assessing abnormal illness behaviors in patients with neck pain.

Methods: The CNOS was administered on patients with neck pain. Reliability and validity analyses were used to evaluate the psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis was used to investigate the dimensionality. Correlations with the Short Form-36 were used to investigate the convergent validity.

Results: The results supported the reliability (inter-rater reliability intra-class correlation: 0.920), validity (correlated with body pain (|ρ|=0.31) and vitality (|ρ| =0.30), and two-factor dimensionality (χ2=5.904, p= 0.66; χ2/df = 0.738; RMSEA< 0.001; CFI = 1.000; TLI = 1.024; SRMR = 0.047) of the scale. The two factors were pain (severe pain) and vitality (poor vitality) expressed by the patients.

Conclusion: The CNOS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain and vitality problems. It helps patients to express severe pain and lack of vitality. The rehabilitation discipline could use the scale to understand pain expression and to design proper rehabilitation programs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • The cervical nonorganic signs has two domains (pain and vitality).

  • The scale is reliable and valid for patients with neck pain.

  • Patients with high scores on the pain domain have severe body pain that may interfere with normal social activities.

  • Clinicians should understand their suffering and try to help them to alleviate the pain.

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to the study participants for their contribution to this study.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.