Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers

Abstract

Purpose

This study explored the acceptability to service providers of delivering a novel group support intervention for people with aphasia (PWA) in a virtual world.

Materials and methods

The service providers were six group coordinators and 10 volunteers. Fourteen of the service providers participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview and 15 took part in a consensus group discussion. Qualitative interviews were analysed using framework analysis. For consensus group discussions, nominal group rankings were analysed and semantically similar responses were identified.

Results

Service providers described the virtual world as a safe space in which to communicate, connect, and experiment. The key barriers were technical, particularly relating to sound and connectivity issues. Service providers suggested a range of improvements to the virtual world and intervention programme. They reported that PWA benefitted from accessing a support group in a virtual world, with opportunities to connect socially and to develop their communication skills.

Conclusions

Service providers found delivery of group support intervention in a virtual world to be acceptable. The use of a bespoke virtual world to deliver group support intervention may enhance the experience and increase its accessibility, enabling more PWA to benefit from this type of intervention.

Implications for rehabilitation

• People with aphasia benefit from group support intervention but may find it difficult to access face-to-face groups.

• Delivery of group support intervention in a virtual world is acceptable to service providers, can enhance the experience and increase accessibility of groups.

• Technical challenges present potential barriers when delivering group support in a virtual world, relating particularly to sound and connectivity.

• Potential benefits of this model of delivery, as perceived by service providers, include opportunities to connect socially and to develop communication skills plus specific and strong levels of enjoyment of the virtual context.

Keywords:

• Aphasia
• group support
• intervention
• service provider
• telerehabilitation
• virtual world

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the coordinators and volunteers who contributed their time and shared their experiences of group support intervention in EVA Park.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

Due to the nature of this research, the supporting data are not available to be shared publicly due to ethical restrictions.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Stroke Association [TSA 2016/05].