The Triple Helix Model as an Instrument of Local Response to the Economic Crisis

Abstract

In an attempt to overcome the impact of the economic crisis that emerged in 2007–2008, the triple helix model (THM) is increasingly being used as an inspiration source for local development policy, even though many localities and regions have not been able to create and sustain the innovation dynamics and sub-dynamics described and prescribed by the model. In fact, in less-advanced contexts, an adaptation and simplification of the THM to the local conditions and practice is likely to occur. Based on semi-structured interviews and direct observation of the evolution of a THM-driven local development environment in a Portuguese small municipality, the authors claim that when the originally complex model is simplified, it seems to be able to mobilize local innovation agents, to legitimize policy efforts and to improve coherence between different policy strands affecting innovation. Even though deprived of its conceptual complexity, the simplified THM may be an effective framework for less-advanced economies to promote innovation and counteract the effects of the economic crisis.

Notes

The European Commission's report provides an in-depth analysis of how the economic downturn impacted on ten European cities of different size and economic strength, and how those cities are devising and implementing their responses. The cities covered are Dublin, Gijón, Jyväskyla, Malmö, Newcastle, Rotterdam, Tallin, Turin and Veria.

The URBACT Programme was launched by the European Commission in 2007, as part of Europe's cohesion policy, aiming to enable cities to work together to pursue socially, economically and environmentally integrated solutions to urban challenges. At present, the Programme involves ca. 300 cities, 29 countries and 5000 active participants (see http://urbact.eu/en/homepage-2/).

The EU Regional Innovative Actions Programme is financed by ERDF: European Regional Development Fund, and aims at encouraging laggard regions to invest in innovation and technological development, in order to reduce the development gap and enhance their competitiveness.

http://urbact.eu/en/projects/innovation-creativity/runup/the-role-of-universities-for-economic-development-in-urban-poles/

Three meta-clusters were identified: habitat (lighting, ceramics, hardware, metallic furniture, etc.), mobility (automotive, cycling industries, etc.), and culture and tourism.