620
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of planning mandates on local plans: a multi-method assessment

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2192-2211 | Received 16 Dec 2016, Accepted 04 Jul 2017, Published online: 17 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of subnational government bodies mandate municipalities to establish a vision for their future development with a local plan. Outside the U.S., few studies have assessed whether these mandates succeed at increasing formal quality, policy focus and implementation of local plans. In addition, the reasons that prompt governments to impose mandates remain unclear. To tackle these issues, we used a multi-method approach combining interviews, plan content analysis and questionnaires to compare mandated and voluntary planning in Switzerland. Our analysis reveals that mandates only have limited impact on local plans. In particular, they do not produce higher quality plans than voluntary planning and do not improve implementation of policies. Our results may imply that (a) planning mandates from subnational governments are ineffective in general or (b) Swiss mandates in particular entail too few requirements and enforcement mechanisms to show a clear effect. Further studies could explore this issue empirically by comparing the characteristics of different planning mandates and assessing their effect on the quality and implementation of local plans. Alternatively, future research efforts could also examine how to find a compromise between mandated and voluntary planning in order to increase local commitment towards plan making.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Matthias Müller, who assisted with the content analysis of the local plans, and to Curtis Gautschi for improving our English. We also thank Felix Kienast for his helpful comments on the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung), as part of the project ‘Controlling urban sprawl to limit soil consumption’ (SPROIL, grant number 406840_142996) conducted within the National Research Programme ‘Sustainable Use of Soil as a Resource’ (NRP68), and the project ‘From plans to land change’ (CONCUR, ER C TBS Consolidator Grant number BSCGIO 157789).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.