93
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forthcoming Special Issue: The bigger the better? The new “macro” regions in France in the lens of territorial changes in Europe

Conflicts, competition and cooperation between territorial self-government units after the administrative reform in 1999: Wielkopolska

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1211-1230 | Received 31 Aug 2020, Accepted 25 Sep 2020, Published online: 04 Nov 2020
 

ABSTRACT

In 1999, the administrative structure in Poland, similar to that existing until 1975, was restored in the territorial dimension, but in the organizational dimension the competences of individual levels (levels), i.e. local (municipal as early as in 1990), subregional (poviats, which were liquidated in 1975) and in new large regions (voivodeships), were divided between regional self-governments and the central government. In Wielkopolska voivodeship established in 1999, a number of areas of conflict or rivalry between administrative units occurred and they concerned, among others:

a / the way of restoration of poviats pattern in 1999, which could take the form of (1) a return to the division from 1975, (2) a slight modification of the division from 1975, taking into account the functional connections created in the years 1975–1998, (3) a significant modification of the division, selected medium-sized towns;

b / the conception of the management of the voivodeship’s capital (Poznań) together with adjacent municipalities in the form of a metropolitan association and the assessment of the effectiveness of this form of management;

c / taking over rural areas by neighbouring cities;

d / obtaining the status of a town by some centres of the voivodeship.

View correction statement:
Publishers’ Note

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Poviats in English are also called counties.

2 Territorial communities in which regional attitudes developed and formed a new regional identity became in the 1990s the defenders of this administrative division.

3 Budner, Kaczmarek, and Matykowski (Citation1993), Kulesza (Citation2000), Swianiewicz (Citation1995), Chojnicki and Czyż (Citation2000), Karliński, Nelicki, and Płoskonka (Citation2000), Kaczmarek (Citation2001, Citation2016), Kaczmarek and Matykowski (Citation1993), Miszczuk (Citation2003), Walczak (Citation2012), Dziki (Citation2013), (Powiat i województwo Citation1992; Projekt podziału Citation1993).

4 Grochowski (Citation1997), Wollmann (Citation1997), Yoder (Citation2003), Swianiewicz (Citation2002, Citation2010), Sakowicz (Citation2012), Swianiewicz, Gendźwiłł, and Zardi (Citation2017); Ebinger, Kuhlmann, and Bogumil (Citation2019).

5 Wagstaff (Citation1999), Arsen (Citation2002), Kaczmarek (Citation2005), Brennetot and de Ruffray (Citation2015).

6 in Poland, the Spanish model was generally perceived as a model of broad autonomy in a unitary state, as the former provinces could form regional communities voluntarily.

7 Szymańska Citation1988; Labasse Citation1989; Whitehand Citation1989; Krzysztofik Citation2006; Sokołowski Citation2014; Krzysztofik and Dymitrow Citation2015; Konecka-Szydłowska, Trócsányi, and Pirisi Citation2018.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.