![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
The current study examines in silico characterization of the structure-inhibitory potency for a set of phenylcarbamic acid derivatives containing an N-arylpiperazine scaffold, considering the electronic, steric and lipophilic properties. The main objective of the ligand-based modelling was the systematic study of classical comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA)/comparative molecular surface analysis (CoMSA) performance for the modelling of in vitro efficiency observed for these phenylcarbamates, revealing their inhibitory activities against a virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. We compared the findings of efficiency modelling produced by a standard 3D methodology (CoMFA) and its neural counterparts (CoMSA) regarding multiple training/test subsets and variables used. Moreover, systematic space inspection, splitting values into the analysed training/test subsets, was performed to monitor statistical estimator performance while mapping the probability-driven pharmacophore pattern. Consequently, a ‘pseudo-consensus’ 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) approach was applied to retrieve an ‘average’ pharmacophore hypothesis by the investigation of the most densely populated training/test subpopulations to specify the potentially important factors contributing to the inhibitory activity of phenylcarbamic acid analogues. In addition, examination of descriptor-based similarity with a principal component analysis (PCA) procedure was employed to visualize noticeable variations in the performance of these molecules with respect to their structure and activity profiles.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Professor Johann Gasteiger for facilitating access to the scientific programs. We would like to acknowledge OpenEye and OpenBabel Scientific Software for the free academic license. This study was also partially supported by SANOFI-AVENTIS Pharma Slovakia.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2018.1517278
