358
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Retracted Article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Perceptions of radicalisation in mental health care and the security domain: roles, responsibilities, and collaboration

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 548-565 | Received 26 Mar 2021, Accepted 04 Jan 2022, Published online: 06 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

This study investigates how perceptions of radicalisation and co-occurring mental health issues differ between mental health care and the security domain, and how these perceptions affect intersectoral collaboration. It is generally thought that intersectoral collaboration is a useful strategy for preventing radicalisation and terrorism, especially when it concerns radicalised persons with mental health issues. It is not clear, however, what perceptions professionals have of radicalisation and collaboration with other disciplines. Data was obtained from focus groups and individual interviews with practitioners and trainers from mental health care and the security domain in the Netherlands. The results show a lack of knowledge about radicalisation in mental health care, whereas in the security domain, there is little understanding of mental health issues. This leads to a mad-bad dichotomy which has a negative effect on collaboration and risk management. Improvement of the intersectoral collaboration by cross-domain familiarization, and strengthening of trust and mutual understanding, should begin with the basic training of professionals in both domains. The Care and Safety Houses in the Netherlands offer a sound base for intersectoral collaboration. Future professionals from different domains ought to be familiarized with each other’s possibilities, limitations, tasks, and roles.

View retraction statement:
Statement of Retraction

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the time which the participating professionals made available, and for sharing their perceptions with us.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.

Notes

1 Disturbing behaviour (Dutch: verward gedrag) refers to any behaviour in the public domain for which the police is called out, regardless of whether it originates from a mental health condition, intoxication, anger, or other non-psychiatric cause.

2 In the Netherlands, signs of domestic violence legally warrant disclosure of concerns by a health professional to a third trusted party or the police, at the discretion of the professional involved, despite regulations on medical confidentiality.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) in the Netherlands.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.